• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查出危险饮酒对退伍军人 PTSD 检查表 DSM-5 诊断准确性的影响。

The impact of screening positive for hazardous alcohol use on the diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among veterans.

机构信息

U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2024 Apr;37(2):328-336. doi: 10.1002/jts.22999. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1002/jts.22999
PMID:38085555
Abstract

The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a widely used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms that has demonstrated strong psychometric properties across settings and samples. Co-occurring hazardous alcohol use and PTSD are prevalent among veterans, and the effects of alcohol use may impact the performance of the PCL-5. However, this possibility is untested. In this study, we evaluated the PCL-5 diagnostic accuracy for veterans who did and did not screen positive for hazardous alcohol use according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C). Participants were 385 veterans recruited from Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. Results indicated that PCL-5 performance, AUC = .904, 95% CI [.870, .937], did not differ as a product of hazardous alcohol use. PCL-5 diagnostic utility was comparably high for veterans with, AUC = .904; 95% CI [.846, .962], and without, AUC = .904 95% CI [.861, .946], positive AUDIT-C screens. Although optimally efficient cutoff scores for veterans who screened positive were higher (i.e., 34-36) than for those with negative screens (i.e., 30), neither were significantly different from the overall PCL-5 cutoff score (i.e., 32), suggesting that neither veterans with nor without positive AUDIT-C screens require differential PCL-5 cutoff scores. The results do underscore the importance of using PCL-5 cutoff scores in concert with clinical judgment when establishing a provisional PTSD diagnosis and highlight the need for additional study of the impact of comorbidities on PCL-5 diagnostic accuracy and cutoff scores.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表 DSM-5(PCL-5)是一种广泛使用的 PTSD 症状自评量表,在各种环境和样本中都具有很强的心理测量特性。共病危险饮酒和 PTSD 在退伍军人中很常见,饮酒的影响可能会影响 PCL-5 的表现。然而,这种可能性尚未得到验证。在这项研究中,我们根据酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费(AUDIT-C)评估了 PCL-5 在筛查出危险饮酒和未筛查出危险饮酒的退伍军人中的诊断准确性。参与者是从退伍军人事务初级保健诊所招募的 385 名退伍军人。结果表明,PCL-5 表现,AUC=.904,95%CI [.870,.937],不受危险饮酒的影响。对于有,AUC=.904;95%CI [.846,.962],和没有,AUC=.904 95%CI [.861,.946],阳性 AUDIT-C 筛查的退伍军人,PCL-5 的诊断效用都很高。虽然对于筛查阳性的退伍军人来说,最佳效率的截断分数更高(即 34-36),但与阴性筛查的退伍军人相比,这并没有显著差异(即 30),也没有显著差异从总体 PCL-5 截断分数(即 32),这表明无论是阳性还是阴性 AUDIT-C 筛查的退伍军人都不需要不同的 PCL-5 截断分数。结果确实强调了在建立暂定 PTSD 诊断时,使用 PCL-5 截断分数与临床判断相结合的重要性,并突出了需要进一步研究共病对 PCL-5 诊断准确性和截断分数的影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of screening positive for hazardous alcohol use on the diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among veterans.筛查出危险饮酒对退伍军人 PTSD 检查表 DSM-5 诊断准确性的影响。
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Apr;37(2):328-336. doi: 10.1002/jts.22999. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
Comparison of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Instruments From Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition vs Fifth Edition in a Large Cohort of US Military Service Members and Veterans.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版与第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表在美军和退伍军人大型队列中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218072. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8072.
3
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)在退伍军人中的心理测量特性
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391. doi: 10.1037/pas0000254. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
An Empirical Crosswalk for the PTSD Checklist: Translating DSM-IV to DSM-5 Using a Veteran Sample.创伤后应激障碍检查表的实证转换:使用退伍军人样本从 DSM-IV 到 DSM-5 的翻译。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Oct;32(5):799-805. doi: 10.1002/jts.22438.
5
Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 in treatment-seeking Black veterans.寻求治疗的黑人退伍军人中 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表的心理测量特性。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Mar;16(3):400-406. doi: 10.1037/tra0001564. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
6
Comparing the Prevalence of Probable and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Sample of U.S. Military Veterans Using the PTSD Checklist.使用 PTSD 清单比较美国退伍军人样本中可能和创伤后应激障碍的患病率。
Assessment. 2023 Oct;30(7):2050-2057. doi: 10.1177/10731911221133483. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
7
27 ways to meet PTSD: Using the PTSD-checklist for DSM-5 to examine PTSD core criteria.27 种遇见创伤后应激障碍的方式:使用 DSM-5 的创伤后应激障碍检查表来检查 PTSD 核心标准。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:504-507. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
8
Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members.寻求治疗的军人中创伤后应激障碍检查表-5(PCL-5)的心理测量分析。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403. doi: 10.1037/pas0000260. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
"Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans": Correction to Bovin et al. (2016).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)在退伍军人中的心理测量特性:对博文等人(2016年)的勘误
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):638. doi: 10.1037/pas0000504.
10
Applying the PTSD Checklist-Civilian and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 crosswalk in a traumatic brain injury sample: A veterans affairs traumatic brain injury model systems study.在创伤性脑损伤样本中应用 PTSD 清单-平民版和 PTSD 清单- DSM-5 对照表:退伍军人事务创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Jun-Jul;36(6-7):425-432. doi: 10.1037/pas0001315.

引用本文的文献

1
The diagnostic accuracy of PTSD assessment instruments used in older adults: a systematic review.老年人使用的创伤后应激障碍评估工具的诊断准确性:一项系统综述。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2498191. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2498191. Epub 2025 May 14.