Warwick Medical School (WMS), The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 12;13(12):e075945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075945.
To better characterise the Awarding Gap (AG) between black, Asian and other minority ethnic (BAME) and white students in UK undergraduate medical education by examining how it affects eight minority ethnicity subgroups (Bangladeshi, black, Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, mixed, other Asian background and other ethnic background) and whether the AG varies by medical school attended.
Retrospective cohort study.
Data extracted from the UK Medical Education Database on students enrolled at 33 UK medical schools in the academic years starting 2012, 2013 and 2014.
16 020 'Home' tuition fee status students who sat the University Clinical Aptitude Test on entry to university and obtained a UK Foundation Programme (UKFP) application score on exit.
UKFP Z-scores on exit from medical school.
There were significant differences in UKFP Z-scores between ethnicity subgroups. After white students, mixed ethnicity students performed best (coefficient -0.15 standard deviations [SD]) compared with white students, (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.23 to -0.08, p<0.001) and Pakistani students scored lowest (coefficient -0.53 SD, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.46, p<0.001). In pairwise comparisons of scores between all nine individual ethnicity subgroups, 15/36 were statistically significant. The AG varied considerably across medical schools. The largest gap showed the coefficient for BAME was -0.83 SD compared with white students (95% CI -1.18 to -0.49, p<0.001), while the smallest demonstrated no statistically significant difference in performance between BAME and white students (+0.05 SD, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.42, p=0.792).
BAME students are significantly disadvantaged by the current UK medical education system. There are clear differences in medical school outcomes between students from different ethnicity subgroups, and the size of the AG also varies by medical school attended. Urgent and effective action must be taken to address the AG and achieve an equal learning environment for our future doctors.
通过考察英国本科医学教育中少数民族族裔(BAME)和白种人学生之间的“授奖差距”(AG)如何影响八个少数民族族裔群体(孟加拉人、黑人、中国人、印度人、巴基斯坦人、混血儿、其他亚洲背景和其他族裔背景),以及 AG 是否因所就读的医学院而异,更好地描述该差距。
回顾性队列研究。
从英国医学教育数据库中提取的数据,该数据库包含 2012 年、2013 年和 2014 年开始在 33 所英国医学院就读的学生。
16020 名“本土”学费状态的学生,他们在进入大学时参加了大学临床能力倾向测验,并在离开大学时获得了英国基础计划(UKFP)的申请分数。
从医学院毕业时的 UKFPZ 分数。
在族裔群体中,UKFPZ 分数存在显著差异。与白人学生相比,混血学生表现最好(系数-0.15 个标准差[SD])(95%置信区间[CI]为-0.23 至-0.08,p<0.001),而巴基斯坦学生得分最低(系数-0.53 SD,95%CI-0.60 至-0.46,p<0.001)。在对所有 9 个个体族裔群体之间的分数进行两两比较中,有 15/36 个分数具有统计学意义。AG 在各医学院之间差异很大。最大差距显示,与白人学生相比,BAME 的系数为-0.83 SD(95%CI-1.18 至-0.49,p<0.001),而最小差距则显示 BAME 和白人学生之间的表现没有统计学上的显著差异(+0.05 SD,95%CI-0.32 至 0.42,p=0.792)。
英国当前的医学教育系统使 BAME 学生处于明显劣势。不同族裔群体的学生在医学院的成绩有明显差异,AG 的大小也因所就读的医学院而异。必须采取紧急和有效的行动来解决 AG 问题,为我们未来的医生创造一个平等的学习环境。