Davis Rebecca, Sikorskii Alla
Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan, USA.
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Res Nurs Health. 2024 Feb;47(1):82-92. doi: 10.1002/nur.22360. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
Recruitment of residents for research from long-term care settings is known to be difficult. The purpose of this study was to summarize the effectiveness and cost in terms of time and dollars of recruitment methods for a cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in long-term care settings. This study was a retrospective, exploratory, descriptive analysis of recruitment data. After recruitment of 15 independent and assisted living communities, residents at each site were recruited to participate in the study using combinations of 12 different recruitment methods. Recruitment methods, time spent screening, and enrollment data were collected. Recruitment data were analyzed at the levels of site, research staff member, and participant. Over the study period, 279 older adults were screened and 172 enrolled from the 15 sites. Many participants were cognitively impaired. Research staff spent 39-89 h recruiting at each site and utilized an average of four different recruitment methods per site. Introductions of participants by site contacts yielded the most consented participants compared to other recruitment methods. Sites that had a dedicated recruiter utilized more recruiting methods and enrolled more participants than those without a dedicated recruiter. The cost of recruiting averaged $1490 per site and $93-$258 per enrollee (mean $144, standard deviation $58), but was more costly in larger facilities. Recruitment of older adults from long-term care communities requires multiple methods of recruitment, skilled recruitment staff, and trust with the staff and potential participants.
从长期护理机构招募居民参与研究是出了名的困难。本研究的目的是总结在长期护理机构进行的一项整群随机对照临床试验的招募方法在时间和金钱方面的有效性和成本。本研究是对招募数据进行的回顾性、探索性、描述性分析。在招募了15个独立和辅助生活社区后,使用12种不同招募方法的组合,招募每个地点的居民参与研究。收集了招募方法、筛选时间和入组数据。在地点、研究工作人员和参与者层面分析招募数据。在研究期间,从15个地点筛选了279名老年人,其中172名入组。许多参与者存在认知障碍。研究工作人员在每个地点花费39 - 89小时进行招募,每个地点平均使用四种不同的招募方法。与其他招募方法相比,由机构联系人介绍参与者产生的同意参与的参与者最多。设有专门招募人员的地点比没有专门招募人员的地点使用更多的招募方法,入组的参与者也更多。每个地点的招募成本平均为1490美元,每名入组者的成本为93 - 258美元(平均144美元,标准差58美元),但在较大的机构中成本更高。从长期护理社区招募老年人需要多种招募方法、熟练的招募人员以及与工作人员和潜在参与者之间的信任。