Bressler R
Drugs. 1979 Jun;17(6):461-70. doi: 10.2165/00003495-197917060-00002.
The controversy over the whether strict blood glucose control prevents or attenuates the complications of diabetes is still unresolved, but the available data support the value of good blood glucose control. The resolution of the controversy is not feasible at present because of the complexity and financial cost of a definitive prospective study and because we may not presently possess pharmacological agents which can accomplish the goal of long term strict control of the blood glucose. Finally, whereas we regard retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy as valid pathological endpoints, we are not secure in assuming that blood glucose represents the critical measurement for longitudinal assessment of metabolic control. Studies evaluating control based on blood and urine glucose assessments are complicated by the failure of the data to reflect changes in minute to minute regulation. Thus, the relative insensitivity of some of these parameters of control could account for failures to demonstrate a correlation between adequacy of therapy and diabetic complications.
严格血糖控制是否能预防或减轻糖尿病并发症的争议仍未解决,但现有数据支持良好血糖控制的价值。由于确定性前瞻性研究的复杂性和经济成本,以及目前我们可能尚未拥有能够实现长期严格控制血糖目标的药物,目前解决这一争议并不可行。最后,虽然我们将视网膜病变、肾病和神经病变视为有效的病理终点,但我们不能确定血糖就是代谢控制纵向评估的关键指标。基于血糖和尿糖评估来评估控制情况的研究因数据未能反映每分钟调节的变化而变得复杂。因此,这些控制参数中的一些相对不敏感可能是未能证明治疗充分性与糖尿病并发症之间存在关联的原因。