Struzina Leena, Pineda Marco, Yargeau Viviane
Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, 3610 rue University, Montréal, Québec H3A 0C5, Canada.
Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, 3610 rue University, Montréal, Québec H3A 0C5, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169333. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169333. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
The occurrence of thirty-four flame retardants and plasticizers throughout treatment steps in a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) was analyzed to assess removal efficiencies of filtration, ultraviolet (UV) treatment, and chlorination. Legacy compounds and replacements were included to compare their presence and persistence. Twenty-four-hour composite sampling, offset to account for retention time, was performed at a direct filtration DWTP in Montreal, Canada over a three-day period. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), considered legacy flame retardants, were infrequently detected or at concentrations <1 ng/L. When overall removal efficiencies could be calculated, the removal of ∑PBDEs was 49 and 94 % for days 2 and 3, respectively. No removal could be calculated on day 1 as PBDEs were only detected in finished drinking water. Higher brominated PBDEs BDE-183 and BDE-154 were only detected in raw water. Organophosphate esters (OPEs), considered replacement flame retardants, were frequently detected in all water samples. The total average concentration of ∑15OPes was 501 ng/L in raw water and 162 ng/L in drinking water, with an average removal efficiency of 67 %. OPEs were mainly removed during filtration, with TCIPP, TDCIPP, and TPHP showing statistically significant removal of 76, 84, and 95 %, respectively. The total average concentration of ∑8plasticizers was 2938 ng/L in raw water and 116 ng/L in drinking water. All plasticizers, except for metabolite MEHP, had significant removal from filtration, and the overall removal of plasticizers ranged from 20 % for DEP to 99 % for DEHP. Drinking water treatment decreases the concentration of these contaminants in drinking water but was less effective in removing flame retardants than plasticizers, as indicated by their higher number of PBDEs detected and higher concentrations of OPEs measured. To our knowledge, it is the first report of the removal of PBDEs, OPE metabolites and plasticizer replacements (DEHA, DIDA, DINCH, DINP) during drinking water treatment.
分析了一家饮用水处理厂(DWTP)整个处理步骤中34种阻燃剂和增塑剂的出现情况,以评估过滤、紫外线(UV)处理和氯化处理的去除效率。纳入了传统化合物及其替代品,以比较它们的存在情况和持久性。在加拿大蒙特利尔的一家直接过滤式DWTP进行了为期三天的24小时混合采样,并考虑了保留时间。多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)被视为传统阻燃剂,很少被检测到,或者浓度<1 ng/L。当能够计算总体去除效率时,第2天和第3天∑PBDEs的去除率分别为49%和94%。第1天无法计算去除率,因为PBDEs仅在成品饮用水中被检测到。高溴化PBDEs BDE-183和BDE-154仅在原水中被检测到。有机磷酸酯(OPEs)被视为替代阻燃剂,在所有水样中均频繁被检测到。原水中∑15种OPEs的总平均浓度为501 ng/L,饮用水中为162 ng/L,平均去除效率为67%。OPEs主要在过滤过程中被去除,其中磷酸三(2-氯丙基)酯(TCIPP)、磷酸三(1,3-二氯丙基)酯(TDCIPP)和磷酸三苯酯(TPHP)的去除率分别在统计学上显著达到76%、84%和95%。原水中∑8种增塑剂的总平均浓度为2938 ng/L,饮用水中为116 ng/L。除代谢物单(2-乙基己基)邻苯二甲酸酯(MEHP)外,所有增塑剂在过滤过程中均有显著去除,增塑剂的总体去除率从邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)的20%到邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)的99%不等。饮用水处理降低了饮用水中这些污染物的浓度,但正如检测到的PBDEs数量更多以及测量到的OPEs浓度更高所表明的那样,在去除阻燃剂方面比增塑剂效果更差。据我们所知,这是关于饮用水处理过程中PBDEs、OPEs代谢物和增塑剂替代品(己二酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHA)、己二酸二异壬酯(DIDA)、1,2-环己烷二甲酸二异壬酯(DINCH)、邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP))去除情况的首次报告。