Ciharova Marketa, Cuijpers Pim, Amanvermez Yagmur, Riper Heleen, Klein Anke M, Bolinski Felix, de Wit Leonore M, van der Heijde Claudia M, Bruffaerts Ronny, Struijs Sascha, Wiers Reinout W, Karyotaki Eirini
Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Internet Interv. 2023 Jul 8;34:100646. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100646. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Transdiagnostic individually-tailored digital interventions reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with moderate effects. However, research into these approaches for college students is scarce and contradicting. In addition, the exact reasons for intervention dropout in this target group are not well known, and the use of individually-tailored intervention features, such as optional modules, has not yet been explored. The current study aimed to (1) investigate reasons for dropout from a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention for college students assessed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) evaluate whether participants used tailoring features intended for their baseline symptoms. A sample of college students with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety symptoms ( = 48) in the Netherlands (partially) followed a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention. We contacted those who did not complete the entire intervention ( = 29) by phone to report the reasons for intervention dropout. Further, we descriptively explored the use of tailoring features (i.e., depression versus anxiety trajectory) and optional modules of the intervention in the whole sample. We identified a range of person- and intervention-related reasons for intervention dropout, most commonly busy schedules, needs for different kinds of help, or absence of personal contact. Furthermore, only less than half of the participants used the individually-tailoring features to address the symptoms they reported as predominant. In conclusion, digital interventions clear about the content and targeted symptoms, tested in user research could prevent dropout and create reasonable expectations of the intervention. Participants would benefit from additional guidance when using tailoring features of digital interventions, as they often do not choose the tailoring features targeting their baseline symptoms.
跨诊断的个性化数字干预措施能减轻成年人的抑郁和焦虑症状,效果中等。然而,针对大学生采用这些方法的研究却很少,且结果相互矛盾。此外,这个目标群体中干预措施退出的确切原因尚不清楚,而且尚未探索使用个性化干预特征,如可选模块。本研究旨在:(1)调查在一项随机对照试验(RCT)中评估的针对大学生的基于互联网的指导性跨诊断个性化干预措施的退出原因;(2)评估参与者是否使用了针对其基线症状的定制特征。荷兰的一组有轻度至中度抑郁和/或焦虑症状的大学生样本(n = 48)部分接受了基于互联网的指导性跨诊断个性化干预措施。我们通过电话联系了那些没有完成整个干预的人(n = 29),以了解干预退出的原因。此外,我们还描述性地探讨了整个样本中定制特征(即抑郁与焦虑轨迹)和干预措施的可选模块的使用情况。我们确定了一系列与个人和干预相关的干预退出原因,最常见的是日程繁忙、需要不同类型的帮助或缺乏人际接触。此外,只有不到一半的参与者使用个性化定制特征来解决他们报告的主要症状。总之,在用户研究中经过测试的、内容和目标症状明确的数字干预措施可以防止退出,并对干预措施产生合理预期。参与者在使用数字干预措施的定制特征时将受益于额外的指导,因为他们通常不会选择针对其基线症状的定制特征。