Roche S M, Renaud D L, Saraceni J, Kelton D F, DeVries T J
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1; ACER Consulting Ltd., Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 5L3.
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Jun;107(6):3347-3366. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23870. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
Lameness and leg injuries are both painful and prevalent across the dairy industry, and are a major welfare concern. There has been a considerable amount of research focused on investigating the risk factors associated with lameness and injuries and how they might be prevented and treated. The objectives of this narrative review were to summarize herd-level prevalence estimates, risk factors, strategies for prevention, control, and treatment of these conditions, and the barriers to best practice adoption for lameness and injuries on dairy farms. There is a relatively high within-herd prevalence of lameness on dairy farms globally, with a recent systematic review estimating the mean prevalence at 22.8%. Similarly, there is a relatively high prevalence of hock injuries, with within-herd estimates ranging from 12% to 81% of cows affected. Knee and neck injuries have been reported to be less common, with 6% to 43% and 1% to 33%, respectively. Numerous risk factors have been associated with the incidence of lameness, notably housing (e.g., access to pasture, bedding depth, bedding type, flooring type, stall design), management (e.g., stall cleanliness, frequency of trimming, holding times, stocking density), and cow-level (e.g., body condition, parity, injured hocks) factors. Risk factors associated with hock injuries can be similarly classified into housing (e.g., bedding type and depth, outdoor access, parlor type, stall design), management (e.g., bedding depth, cleanliness), and cow (e.g., parity, days in milk, lameness) factors. Key preventative approaches for lameness include routine preventative and corrective hoof trimming, improving hoof cushioning and traction through access to pasture or adding rubber flooring, deep-bedded stalls, sand bedding, ensuring appropriate stocking densities, reduced holding times, and the frequent use of routine footbaths. Very little research has been conducted on hock, knee, and neck injury prevention and recovery. Numerous researchers have concluded that both extrinsic (e.g., time, money, space) and intrinsic (e.g., farmer attitude, perception, priorities, and mindset) barriers exist to addressing lameness and injuries on dairy farms. There are many diverse stakeholders in lameness and injury management including the farmer, farm staff, veterinarian, hoof trimmer, nutritionist, and other advisors. Addressing dairy cattle lameness and injuries must, therefore, consider the people involved, as it is these people who are influencing and implementing on-farm decisions related to lameness prevention, treatment, and control.
跛行和腿部损伤在乳制品行业中既痛苦又普遍,是一个主要的福利问题。已经有大量研究致力于调查与跛行和损伤相关的风险因素以及如何预防和治疗它们。本叙述性综述的目的是总结畜群水平的患病率估计、风险因素、这些病症的预防、控制和治疗策略,以及奶牛场跛行和损伤最佳实践采用的障碍。全球奶牛场跛行在畜群中的患病率相对较高,最近一项系统综述估计平均患病率为22.8%。同样,跗关节损伤的患病率也相对较高,畜群内受影响奶牛的估计范围为12%至81%。据报道,膝盖和颈部损伤不太常见,分别为6%至43%和1%至33%。许多风险因素与跛行的发生率有关,特别是畜舍(如牧场使用情况、垫料深度、垫料类型、地板类型、牛栏设计)、管理(如牛栏清洁度、修剪频率、停留时间、饲养密度)和奶牛个体因素(如体况、胎次、跗关节受伤)。与跗关节损伤相关的风险因素可类似地分为畜舍(如垫料类型和深度、户外通道、挤奶厅类型、牛栏设计)、管理(如垫料深度、清洁度)和奶牛(如胎次、产奶天数、跛行)因素。跛行的关键预防方法包括常规的预防性和矫正性蹄部修剪,通过使用牧场或添加橡胶地板、厚垫料牛栏、沙质垫料来改善蹄部缓冲和抓地力,确保适当的饲养密度,减少停留时间,以及频繁使用常规足浴。关于跗关节、膝盖和颈部损伤的预防和恢复的研究很少。许多研究人员得出结论,在解决奶牛场的跛行和损伤问题上存在外部(如时间、金钱、空间)和内部(如农民态度、认知、优先事项和思维模式)障碍。跛行和损伤管理涉及许多不同的利益相关者,包括农民、农场工作人员、兽医、蹄部修剪工、营养师和其他顾问。因此,解决奶牛跛行和损伤问题必须考虑相关人员,因为正是这些人在影响和实施与跛行预防、治疗和控制相关的农场决策。