Suppr超能文献

无透视引导下心室期前收缩导管消融术:多中心经验。

Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions: a multicenter experience.

机构信息

Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Division of Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic Department, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Jun;67(4):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01723-5. Epub 2023 Dec 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation has become an established treatment option for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). The use of fluoroscopy exposes patients and medical staff to potentially harmful stochastic and deterministic effects of ionizing radiations. We sought to analyze procedural outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy using a "zero fluoroscopy" approach for catheter ablation of PVCs.

METHODS

The present retrospective, multicenter, observational study included 131 patients having undergone catheter ablation of PVCs using "zero fluoroscopy" between 2019 and 2020 in four centers compared with another group who underwent the procedure with fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Median age was 51.0 ± 15.9 years old; males were 77 (58.8%). Among the study population, 26 (19.8%) had a cardiomyopathy. The most frequent PVC origin was right ventricular outflow tract (55%) followed by the left ventricle (16%), LVOT and cusps (13.7%), and aortomitral continuity (5.3%). Acute suppression of PVC was achieved in 127 patients (96.9%). At 12 months, a complete success was documented in 109 patients (83.2%), a reduction in PVC burden in 18 patients (13.7%), and a failure was recorded in four patients (3.1%). Only two minor complications occurred (femoral hematoma and arteriovenous fistula conservatively treated).

CONCLUSIONS

The PVC ablation with a "zero" fluoroscopy approach appears to be a safe procedure with no major complications and good rates of success and recurrence in our multicenter experience.

摘要

背景

导管消融已成为治疗室性早搏(PVCs)的一种既定治疗选择。使用透视会使患者和医务人员暴露在电离辐射的潜在有害随机和确定性效应之下。我们试图通过使用“无透视”方法分析导管消融 PVC 的安全性和疗效。

方法

本回顾性、多中心、观察性研究纳入了 2019 年至 2020 年在四个中心使用“无透视”方法进行导管消融 PVC 的 131 例患者,与另一组使用透视方法进行该手术的患者进行比较。

结果

中位年龄为 51.0±15.9 岁;男性 77 例(58.8%)。在研究人群中,26 例(19.8%)患有心肌病。最常见的 PVC 起源是右心室流出道(55%),其次是左心室(16%)、LVOT 和瓣叶(13.7%),以及主动脉瓣下连续性(5.3%)。127 例患者(96.9%)在急性期抑制了 PVC。12 个月时,109 例患者(83.2%)记录到完全成功,18 例患者(13.7%)PVC 负荷减少,4 例患者(3.1%)记录到失败。仅发生了两例轻微并发症(股血肿和动静脉瘘,保守治疗)。

结论

在我们的多中心经验中,无透视方法的 PVC 消融似乎是一种安全的程序,没有主要并发症,成功率和复发率都较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验