School of Social Sciences and Professions, London Metropolitan University, 166-220 Holloway Rd, London, N7 8DB, UK.
School of Social Sciences and Professions, London Metropolitan University, 166-220 Holloway Rd, London, N7 8DB, UK.
Public Health. 2024 Feb;227:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.009. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
This article presents a qualitative evaluation of a 13-week digital intervention, 'Let's Move with Leon', designed to improve physical activity in people with a musculoskeletal condition.
A qualitative evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of the intervention at improving self-reported physical activity.
A total of 184 participants received the intervention and were asked each week for 13 weeks to provide comment on their use and the usefulness of the digital physical activity behaviour change intervention. In addition, after 13 weeks, 12 participants took part in a semistructured interview to understand their use and the usefulness of the intervention. A thematic analysis was conducted on the combined qualitative data set.
A total of 128 of the 184 intervention participants (70.11%) provided at least one qualitative comment over the course of the evaluation (mean number of comments per participant = 5); in total, 674 comments were received. The thematic analysis identified three themes: (1) dipping in and out, (2) one size does not fit all and (3) monitoring and feedback. The qualitative data suggest that participants used the intervention sporadically, dipping in and out due to other commitments, and competing programmes, their changing physical ability, confidence and motivation. Not getting off to a good start was detrimental to use; many wanted to come back to the programme at a more appropriate time. A 'one size fits' approach catered for some but not all participants. Whilst not a predetermined intervention component the act of monitoring levels of activity as a data collection method seemed to encourage physical activity but may also result in negative social comparisons.
Digital physical activity behaviour change interventions are not one-size-fits-all; personalisation is key. Monitoring of activity by a named person can create commitment. Many dip in and out. Digital physical activity behaviour change interventions could complement physiotherapy exercises for people with musculoskeletal conditions. Signposting to local activities should be considered.
本文对一项为期 13 周的数字干预措施“与利昂一起行动”进行了定性评估,该措施旨在提高患有肌肉骨骼疾病的人的身体活动水平。
一项定性评估嵌入在一项随机对照试验中,评估该干预措施在提高自我报告的身体活动方面的有效性。
共有 184 名参与者接受了该干预措施,并在 13 周内每周被要求提供关于他们对数字身体活动行为改变干预措施的使用和有用性的意见。此外,在 13 周后,12 名参与者参加了半结构化访谈,以了解他们对干预措施的使用和有用性的看法。对综合定性数据集进行了主题分析。
在评估过程中,共有 184 名干预参与者中的 128 名(70.11%)至少提供了一条定性意见(每位参与者的平均意见数为 5 条);共收到 674 条意见。主题分析确定了三个主题:(1)时断时续,(2)一刀切,(3)监测和反馈。定性数据表明,参与者断断续续地使用该干预措施,由于其他承诺、竞争项目、他们不断变化的身体能力、信心和动力,时而中断。一开始没有取得好的效果对使用不利;许多人希望在更合适的时候回到该计划。一刀切的方法满足了一些参与者的需求,但不是所有参与者的需求。虽然不是预先确定的干预组成部分,但作为数据收集方法的活动监测似乎鼓励了身体活动,但也可能导致负面的社会比较。
数字身体活动行为改变干预措施不是一刀切的;个性化是关键。由指定人员对活动进行监测可以建立承诺。许多人时断时续。数字身体活动行为改变干预措施可以补充肌肉骨骼疾病患者的物理治疗运动。应考虑将其引导到当地活动。