• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进多种族高危糖尿病人群进行身体活动的行为干预:PROPELS 三臂 RCT 研究。

Behavioural interventions to promote physical activity in a multiethnic population at high risk of diabetes: PROPELS three-arm RCT.

机构信息

Diabetes Research Centre, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East Midlands, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(77):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta25770.

DOI:10.3310/hta25770
PMID:34995176
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of mortality globally and accounts for significant health resource expenditure. Increased physical activity can reduce the risk of diabetes. However, the longer-term clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in those at high risk of type 2 diabetes is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether or not Walking Away from Diabetes (Walking Away) - a low-resource, 3-hour group-based behavioural intervention designed to promote physical activity through pedometer use in those with prediabetes - leads to sustained increases in physical activity when delivered with and without an integrated mobile health intervention compared with control.

DESIGN

Three-arm, parallel-group, pragmatic, superiority randomised controlled trial with follow-up conducted at 12 and 48 months.

SETTING

Primary care and the community.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults whose primary care record included a prediabetic blood glucose measurement recorded within the past 5 years [HbA ≥ 42 mmol/mol (6.0%), < 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) mmol/mol; fasting glucose ≥ 5.5 mmol/l, < 7.0 mmol/l; or 2-hour post-challenge glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/l, < 11.1 mmol/l] were recruited between December 2013 and February 2015. Data collection was completed in July 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomised (1 : 1 : 1) using a web-based tool to (1) control (information leaflet), (2) Walking Away with annual group-based support or (3) Walking Away Plus (comprising Walking Away, annual group-based support and a mobile health intervention that provided automated, individually tailored text messages to prompt pedometer use and goal-setting and provide feedback, in addition to biannual telephone calls). Participants and data collectors were not blinded; however, the staff who processed the accelerometer data were blinded to allocation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was accelerometer-measured ambulatory activity (steps per day) at 48 months. Other objective and self-reported measures of physical activity were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1366 individuals were randomised (median age 61 years, median body mass index 28.4 kg/m, median ambulatory activity 6638 steps per day, women 49%, black and minority ethnicity 28%). Accelerometer data were available for 1017 (74%) and 993 (73%) individuals at 12 and 48 months, respectively. The primary outcome assessment at 48 months found no differences in ambulatory activity compared with control in either group (Walking Away Plus: 121 steps per day, 97.5% confidence interval -290 to 532 steps per day; Walking Away: 91 steps per day, 97.5% confidence interval -282 to 463). This was consistent across ethnic groups. At the intermediate 12-month assessment, the Walking Away Plus group had increased their ambulatory activity by 547 (97.5% confidence interval 211 to 882) steps per day compared with control and were 1.61 (97.5% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.45) times more likely to achieve 150 minutes per week of objectively assessed unbouted moderate to vigorous physical activity. In the Walking Away group, there were no differences compared with control at 12 months. Secondary anthropometric, biomechanical and mental health outcomes were unaltered in either intervention study arm compared with control at 12 or 48 months, with the exception of small, but sustained, reductions in body weight in the Walking Away study arm (≈ 1 kg) at the 12- and 48-month follow-ups. Lifetime cost-effectiveness modelling suggested that usual care had the highest probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Of 50 serious adverse events, only one (myocardial infarction) was deemed possibly related to the intervention and led to the withdrawal of the participant from the study.

LIMITATIONS

Loss to follow-up, although the results were unaltered when missing data were replaced using multiple imputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining a physical activity intervention with text messaging and telephone support resulted in modest, but clinically meaningful, changes in physical activity at 12 months, but the changes were not sustained at 48 months.

FUTURE WORK

Future research is needed to investigate which intervention types, components and features can help to maintain physical activity behaviour change over the longer term.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83465245.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 25, No. 77. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病是全球主要的死亡原因之一,也是重大的医疗资源支出原因。增加身体活动可以降低糖尿病的风险。然而,对于高风险 2 型糖尿病患者,身体活动干预的长期临床效果和成本效益尚不清楚。

目的

研究 Walking Away from Diabetes(Walking Away)——一种低资源、3 小时的基于小组的行为干预措施,旨在通过使用计步器来促进身体活动,是否会在与集成移动健康干预相结合的情况下,导致体力活动持续增加,与对照组相比。

设计

三臂、平行组、实用、优势随机对照试验,在 12 个月和 48 个月时进行随访。

地点

初级保健和社区。

参与者

过去 5 年内,他们的初级保健记录中包括糖尿病前期的血糖测量值[糖化血红蛋白(HbA)≥42mmol/mol(6.0%),<48mmol/mol(6.5%)mmol/mol;空腹血糖≥5.5mmol/L,<7.0mmol/L;或 2 小时后葡萄糖负荷≥7.8mmol/L,<11.1mmol/L]的成年人,于 2013 年 12 月至 2015 年 2 月期间招募。数据收集于 2019 年 7 月完成。

干预措施

参与者使用基于网络的工具进行随机分组(1:1:1),随机分配到(1)对照组(信息传单)、(2)每年进行小组支持的 Walking Away 或(3)Walking Away Plus(包括 Walking Away、每年进行小组支持和移动健康干预,移动健康干预会自动向参与者发送个性化短信,以提示计步器的使用和目标设定,并提供反馈,同时每两个月进行一次电话访问)。参与者和数据收集人员未设盲;但是,处理加速度计数据的工作人员设盲。

主要结局指标

主要结局指标是 48 个月时的加速度计测量的日常活动(每天的步数)。还评估了其他客观和自我报告的身体活动测量指标。

结果

共有 1366 人随机分组(中位年龄 61 岁,中位体重指数 28.4kg/m,中位日常活动 6638 步/天,女性占 49%,黑人及少数族裔占 28%)。12 个月和 48 个月时,分别有 1017(74%)和 993(73%)人提供了加速度计数据。在 48 个月的主要结局评估中,与对照组相比,在任何一组中,日常活动都没有差异(Walking Away Plus:每天增加 121 步,97.5%置信区间为-290 到 532 步/天;Walking Away:每天增加 91 步,97.5%置信区间为-282 到 463 步/天)。这在不同种族群体中都是一致的。在 12 个月的中期评估中,Walking Away Plus 组的日常活动增加了 547 步/天(97.5%置信区间为 211 到 882 步/天),与对照组相比,他们更有可能每周进行 150 分钟的非捆绑中度至剧烈体力活动,客观评估。在 Walking Away 组中,与对照组相比,12 个月时没有差异。在 12 个月和 48 个月时,与对照组相比,在任何干预研究组中,次要的人体测量、生物力学和心理健康结果均未改变,除了 Walking Away 组的体重在 12 个月和 48 个月时持续轻微下降(≈1kg)。终生成本效益建模表明,在 £20000 每质量调整生命年的阈值下,常规护理具有最高的成本效益概率。50 例严重不良事件中,只有 1 例(心肌梗死)被认为可能与干预措施有关,导致参与者退出研究。

局限性

失访率虽然缺失数据使用多重插补进行替换,但结果未改变。

结论

将体力活动干预与短信和电话支持相结合,在 12 个月时可适度但具有临床意义地改变体力活动,但在 48 个月时没有持续。

未来工作

需要进一步研究哪种干预类型、组成部分和特征可以帮助在长期内保持体力活动行为的改变。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN83465245。

资金

本项目由英国国家卫生研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,将在;第 25 卷,第 77 期。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。

相似文献

1
Behavioural interventions to promote physical activity in a multiethnic population at high risk of diabetes: PROPELS three-arm RCT.促进多种族高危糖尿病人群进行身体活动的行为干预:PROPELS 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(77):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta25770.
2
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.为患有慢性疾病的不活跃成年人的运动推荐计划添加基于网络的行为支持:e-coachER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(63):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta24630.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT.基于计步器的 45 至 75 岁人群行走干预,有无执业护士支持:PACE-UP 三臂群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jun;22(37):1-274. doi: 10.3310/hta22370.
5
Promoting physical activity in a multi-ethnic population at high risk of diabetes: the 48-month PROPELS randomised controlled trial.在一个多民族、糖尿病高危人群中促进身体活动:48 个月的 PROPELS 随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2021 Jun 3;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01997-4.
6
Exercise to prevent shoulder problems after breast cancer surgery: the PROSPER RCT.乳腺癌手术后预防肩部问题的运动:PROSPER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(15):1-124. doi: 10.3310/JKNZ2003.
7
Supporting self-management with an internet intervention for low back pain in primary care: a RCT (SupportBack 2).在初级保健中通过互联网干预支持腰痛自我管理:一项随机对照试验(SupportBack 2)。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr;29(7):1-90. doi: 10.3310/GDPS2418.
8
Nurse-delivered sleep restriction therapy to improve insomnia disorder in primary care: the HABIT RCT.护士主导的睡眠限制疗法改善初级保健中的失眠障碍:HABIT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(36):1-107. doi: 10.3310/RJYT4275.
9
Motivational support intervention to reduce smoking and increase physical activity in smokers not ready to quit: the TARS RCT.动机支持干预减少吸烟者的吸烟量并增加其运动量,适用于那些尚未准备好戒烟的吸烟者:TARS RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Mar;27(4):1-277. doi: 10.3310/KLTG1447.
10
PRomotion Of Physical activity through structured Education with differing Levels of ongoing Support for people at high risk of type 2 diabetes (PROPELS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过结构化教育促进身体活动并为2型糖尿病高危人群提供不同程度的持续支持(PROPELS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 2;16:289. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0813-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.预防2型糖尿病的数字健康干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67507. doi: 10.2196/67507.
2
The Effect of Combining mHealth and Health Professional-Led Intervention for Improving Health-Related Outcomes in Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.移动健康与健康专业人员主导的干预措施相结合对改善慢性病健康相关结局的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Jan 20;14:e55835. doi: 10.2196/55835.
3
5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
5. 促进积极的健康行为和福祉以改善健康结局:2025年糖尿病照护标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S86-S127. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S005.
4
How should trial teams make decisions about the proportions and diversity of the ethnic groups in their trial?试验团队应如何决定试验中各族群的比例和多样性?
Trials. 2024 Nov 15;25(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08625-5.
5
A systematic review on eHealth technology personalization approaches.关于电子健康技术个性化方法的系统评价。
iScience. 2024 Aug 19;27(9):110771. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110771. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
6
Behaviour change interventions to improve physical activity in adults: a systematic review of economic evaluations.行为改变干预措施以提高成年人的身体活动水平:系统评价中的经济评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 9;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01614-6.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of two interventions to promote physical activity in a multiethnic population at high risk of diabetes: an economic evaluation of the 48-month PROPELS randomized controlled trial.两种促进糖尿病高危多民族人群身体活动的干预措施的成本效益分析:48个月PROPELS随机对照试验的经济评估
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Mar 12;12(2):e003516. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003516.
8
Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review.下游健康促进措施中的成分,以减少成年人的糖摄入量:系统评价。
Nutr J. 2024 Jan 17;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12937-023-00884-3.
9
5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.5. 促进积极的健康行为与福祉以改善健康结果:2024年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S77-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S005.
10
Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science.预防 2 型糖尿病:行为科学研究议程。
Diabet Med. 2023 Aug;40(8):e15147. doi: 10.1111/dme.15147. Epub 2023 May 20.