School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1237-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07313-0. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupressure on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.
PubMed, Embase, Springer, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) of treating nausea and vomiting during pregnancy by acupressure from the inception date of database to July 31st, 2023. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by researchers. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration's bias risk assessment tool, meta-analysis by Stata 17.0 software, and publication bias by Begg's test.
A total of 11 RCTs involving 1378 pregnant women were included in this review, which was assessed to be moderate quality. 10 RCTs involving 1298 pregnant women were assessed for the meta-analysis. The results revealed that acupressure showed significant difference on improvement in symptom score compared with sham acupressure (pooled MD, - 1.33; 95%CI [- 2.06, - 0.61]; P < 0.001) or control group (pooled MD, - 0.73; 95%CI [- 1.08, - 0.39]; P < 0.001), and incidence of effective rate compared with sham acupressure group (pooled RR, 1.78; 95%CI [1.03, 3.07]; P = 0.039). However, no statistical significance was found between acupressure and control group (pooled RR, 4.53; 95%CI [0.67, 30.48]; P = 0.120) on effective rate. On comparing acupressure with sham acupressure, there was no beneficial effect on preventing nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (pooled RR, 0.83; 95%CI [0.50, 1.38]; P = 0.476), shortening the duration of hospital stay (pooled MD, - 0.78; 95%CI [- 1.98, 0.41]; P = 0.199) and improving patient satisfaction (pooled RR, 1.36; 95%CI [0.47, 3.91]; P = 0.570). Begg's test did not reveal any publication bias. Only one RCT reported minimal acupressure-related adverse events.
Acupressure may have potential favorable or encouraging effect on treating nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, but strong supportive data are not yet available. Well-designed and large-scale RCTs should be conducted for assessing and confirming the efficacy and safety of acupressure in nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.
本研究旨在评估穴位按压治疗妊娠期恶心呕吐的疗效和安全性。
检索PubMed、Embase、Springer、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆,收集自数据库建立以来至 2023 年 7 月 31 日所有穴位按压治疗妊娠期恶心呕吐的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究人员独立进行研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。采用 Cochrane 协作偏倚风险评估工具、Stata 17.0 软件进行荟萃分析和 Begg 检验进行发表偏倚评估,评价纳入研究的方法学质量。
本综述共纳入 11 项 RCT,涉及 1378 名孕妇,质量评价为中等。10 项 RCT 纳入 1298 名孕妇进行荟萃分析。结果显示,与假穴位按压(汇总 MD,-1.33;95%CI [-2.06,-0.61];P<0.001)或对照组相比,穴位按压在改善症状评分方面有显著差异,与 sham 穴位按压组(汇总 MD,-0.73;95%CI [-1.08,-0.39];P<0.001)或对照组(汇总 MD,-0.73;95%CI [-1.08,-0.39];P<0.001)相比,穴位按压在有效率方面也有显著差异,与 sham 穴位按压组(汇总 RR,1.78;95%CI [1.03,3.07];P=0.039)相比,穴位按压在有效率方面也有显著差异。然而,穴位按压与对照组(汇总 RR,4.53;95%CI [0.67,30.48];P=0.120)之间无统计学意义。与 sham 穴位按压相比,穴位按压对预防妊娠期恶心呕吐无明显获益(汇总 RR,0.83;95%CI [0.50,1.38];P=0.476),缩短住院时间(汇总 MD,-0.78;95%CI [-1.98,0.41];P=0.209)和提高患者满意度(汇总 RR,1.36;95%CI [0.47,3.91];P=0.570)无明显获益。Begg 检验未发现发表偏倚。仅有一项 RCT 报告了轻微的穴位按压相关不良事件。
穴位按压可能对治疗妊娠期恶心呕吐有潜在的有利或鼓励作用,但目前尚无强有力的支持数据。应开展设计良好、规模较大的 RCT,以评估和确认穴位按压治疗妊娠期恶心呕吐的疗效和安全性。