• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)长时间输注作为动员方案可能会提高初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的动员效率:单中心经验。

Prolonged infusion time of cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a mobilization regimen may improve mobilization efficiency in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single center experience.

机构信息

Department of Haematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2289603. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2289603. Epub 2023 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2023.2289603
PMID:38104533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10732221/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of two different infusion durations of cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-six consecutive NDMM patients receiving CTX plus G-CSF mobilization and autologous stem cell transplantation during the period of September 2008 to May 2020 were selected for retrospective analysis. According to differences in prolonged infusion time of CTX, they were divided into a 24-h group (24-h continuous infusion) and a control group (4-6 h of infusion). Mobilization and safety of infusion were analyzed. Flow cytometry was used to detect the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the factors influencing the number of CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

The mean CD34+ cell counts collected in 24-h and control groups were 6.78 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.59-11.69) and 4.48 (IQR 2.39-6.30) ×10/kg, respectively ( < 0.001). Meanwhile, the target number of CD34+ cells/kg (defined as ≥4 × 10/kg) was collected from 51 (75%) of cases in 24-h group vs. 45 (51%) in the control group ( = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified the independence of CTX infusion time as a factor influencing the target number of CD34+ cells/kg [odds ratio OR, 4.045; 95% CI: 1.630-10.038,  = 0.003]. The post-transplantation time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 (IQR 9-11) in 24-h group and 11 (IQR 10-12) in control group ( < 0.001). Finally, no statistical differences were identified between groups in terms of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with NDMM, 24-h continuous infusion of CTX plus G-CSF contributes to improved mobilization efficiency and equivalent toxicity as a stem cell mobilization regimen.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明不同环磷酰胺(CTX)输注时间持续时间对新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者外周血造血干细胞动员的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年 9 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受 CTX 联合 G-CSF 动员和自体干细胞移植的 156 例连续 NDMM 患者。根据 CTX 延长输注时间的差异,将患者分为 24 小时组(24 小时连续输注)和对照组(4-6 小时输注)。分析动员和输注的安全性。流式细胞术检测外周血 CD34+细胞计数。采用多变量分析确定影响 CD34+细胞数量的因素。

结果

24 小时组和对照组采集的平均 CD34+细胞计数分别为 6.78(四分位距 [IQR] 3.59-11.69)和 4.48(IQR 2.39-6.30)×106/kg( < 0.001)。同时,24 小时组 51 例(75%)达到目标 CD34+细胞/kg(定义为≥4×106/kg),对照组 45 例(51%)达到目标值( = 0.002)。多变量分析确定 CTX 输注时间是影响目标 CD34+细胞/kg 的独立因素[比值比 OR,4.045;95%置信区间:1.630-10.038, = 0.003]。24 小时组中性粒细胞植入的移植后时间为 10(IQR 9-11),对照组为 11(IQR 10-12)( < 0.001)。最后,两组在血液学和非血液学毒性方面无统计学差异。

结论

对于 NDMM 患者,CTX 联合 G-CSF 24 小时连续输注可提高动员效率,且作为干细胞动员方案毒性相当。

相似文献

1
Prolonged infusion time of cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a mobilization regimen may improve mobilization efficiency in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single center experience.环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)长时间输注作为动员方案可能会提高初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的动员效率:单中心经验。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2289603. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2289603. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
2
[Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].依托泊苷联合重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子与环磷酰胺联合重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子动员自体外周血干细胞的比较
Ai Zheng. 2003 Dec;22(12):1311-6.
3
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与安慰剂联合粒细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤且外周血 CD34+细胞计数低的患者中的 CD34+造血干细胞:一项随机试验的亚组分析结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
4
Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子用于多发性骨髓瘤患者造血干细胞动员
J Clin Apher. 2016 Oct;31(5):423-8. doi: 10.1002/jca.21421. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
5
Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.两种干细胞动员方案(环磷酰胺联合 G-CSF 或单独 G-CSF)在多发性骨髓瘤中的疗效、安全性和生存结局比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Feb;100(2):563-573. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04376-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.超越 CD34+ 细胞剂量:外周血造血干细胞动员方法(粒细胞集落刺激因子[G-CSF]、G-CSF 加plerixafor 或环磷酰胺 G-CSF/粒细胞-巨噬细胞[GM]-CSF)对集落形成单位-GM 数量、植入和第 100 天造血移植物功能的影响。
Transfusion. 2011 Sep;51(9):1995-2000. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03085.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
7
[Comparison of etoposide combined with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide combined with G-CSF in the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].依托泊苷联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子用于动员多发性骨髓瘤患者自体外周血干细胞的比较
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 14;45(4):351-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231124-00274.
8
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.粒细胞集落刺激因子与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子联合强化化疗用于多发性骨髓瘤外周血干细胞动员和自体移植的随机对照研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jun;10(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.02.001.
9
Efficacy of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus originator granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in de novo multiple myeloma patients.生物类似物粒细胞集落刺激因子与原研粒细胞集落刺激因子在初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞动员中的疗效比较
Cytotherapy. 2015 Oct;17(10):1485-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.祖细胞动员的随机交叉试验:大剂量环磷酰胺加粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子加G-CSF的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(9):1824-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.9.1824.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.干细胞移植在多发性骨髓瘤中的作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;13(4):863. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040863.
2
Comparison of efficacy, safety, patients' quality of life, and doctors' occupational stress between lenalidomide-based and bortezomib-based induction in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.来那度胺为基础与硼替佐米为基础的诱导化疗方案用于初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效、安全性、患者生活质量及医生职业压力的比较。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1656-1667. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3762. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Correction to: Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
对《环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与单用粒细胞集落刺激因子两种干细胞动员方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效、安全性及生存结局比较:一项荟萃分析》的勘误
Ann Hematol. 2021 Feb;100(2):575. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04427-w.
4
Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.多发性骨髓瘤,第 3.2021 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Dec 2;18(12):1685-1717. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0057.
5
Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.自体造血干细胞移植对比硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松(联合或不联合硼替佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松巩固治疗)以及来那度胺维持治疗用于新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(EMN02/HO95):一项多中心、随机、开放标签的3期研究
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e456-e468. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30099-5. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
[High dose melphalan (HDM) is superior to cyclophosphamide plus etoposide and busulfan (CVB) as the conditioning regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma].在多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植中,高剂量美法仑(HDM)作为预处理方案优于环磷酰胺加依托泊苷及白消安(CVB)。
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 14;40(9):732-737. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.09.004.
7
Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease and High-Risk Cytogenetics: A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.自体干细胞移植联合治疗对伴有髓外疾病和高危细胞遗传学的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的疗效改善:来自欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会慢性恶性肿瘤工作组的研究。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Nov;25(11):2134-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
8
Multiple myeloma: Every year a new standard?多发性骨髓瘤:每年都有新标准?
Hematol Oncol. 2019 Jun;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):62-65. doi: 10.1002/hon.2586.
9
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.多发性骨髓瘤的治疗:ASCO 和 CCO 联合临床实践指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1228-1263. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02096. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Pros and cons of frontline autologous transplant in multiple myeloma: the debate over timing.一线自体移植在多发性骨髓瘤中的利弊:时机之争。
Blood. 2019 Feb 14;133(7):652-659. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-825349. Epub 2018 Dec 26.