• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

取代学术期刊。

Replacing academic journals.

作者信息

Brembs Björn, Huneman Philippe, Schönbrodt Felix, Nilsonne Gustav, Susi Toma, Siems Renke, Perakakis Pandelis, Trachana Varvara, Ma Lai, Rodriguez-Cuadrado Sara

机构信息

Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

IHPST, CNRS, Paris, France.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jul 19;10(7):230206. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230206. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.230206
PMID:38107166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10723084/
Abstract

Replacing traditional journals with a more modern solution is not a new idea. Here, we propose ways to overcome the social dilemma underlying the decades of inaction. Any solution needs to not only resolve the current problems but also be capable of preventing takeover by corporations: it needs to replace traditional journals with a decentralized, resilient, evolvable network that is interconnected by open standards and open-source norms under the governance of the scholarly community. It needs to replace the monopolies connected to journals with a genuine, functioning and well-regulated market. In this new market, substitutable service providers compete and innovate according to the conditions of the scholarly community, avoiding sustained vendor lock-in. Therefore, a standards body needs to form under the governance of the scholarly community to allow the development of open scholarly infrastructures servicing the entire research workflow. We propose a redirection of money from legacy publishers to the new network by funding bodies broadening their minimal infrastructure requirements at recipient institutions to include modern infrastructure components replacing and complementing journal functionalities. Such updated eligibility criteria by funding agencies would help realign the financial incentives for recipient institutions with public and scholarly interest.

摘要

用更现代的解决方案取代传统期刊并不是一个新想法。在此,我们提出了克服数十年来无所作为背后的社会困境的方法。任何解决方案不仅要解决当前的问题,还要能够防止被企业接管:它需要用一个去中心化、有韧性、可进化的网络取代传统期刊,这个网络在学术社区的治理下,通过开放标准和开源规范相互连接。它需要用一个真正运作良好且监管完善的市场取代与期刊相关的垄断。在这个新市场中,可替代的服务提供商根据学术社区的条件进行竞争和创新,避免持续的供应商锁定。因此,需要在学术社区的治理下成立一个标准机构,以促进服务于整个研究工作流程的开放学术基础设施的发展。我们建议资助机构通过扩大对受资助机构的最低基础设施要求,将资金从传统出版商转向新网络,使其包括取代和补充期刊功能的现代基础设施组件。资助机构如此更新的资格标准将有助于使受资助机构的财务激励与公共和学术利益重新保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/fb49440719fc/rsos230206f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/bfbb5ef42a90/rsos230206f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/008e07ced485/rsos230206f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/fb49440719fc/rsos230206f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/bfbb5ef42a90/rsos230206f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/008e07ced485/rsos230206f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4070/10723084/fb49440719fc/rsos230206f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Replacing academic journals.取代学术期刊。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jul 19;10(7):230206. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230206. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
ChatGPT and Corporations of Mega-journals Jeopardize the Norms That Underpin Academic Publishing.ChatGPT与大型期刊公司危及学术出版的基础规范。
Arch Iran Med. 2024 Feb 1;27(2):110-112. doi: 10.34172/aim.2024.17.
3
Current market rates for scholarly publishing services.当前学术出版服务的市场费率。
F1000Res. 2021 Jan 12;10:20. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27468.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
5
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.在掠夺性期刊上发表文章的伦理问题。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):279-284. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030.
6
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.黑名单和白名单应对掠夺性出版:横断面比较和主题分析。
mBio. 2019 Jun 4;10(3):e00411-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00411-19.
7
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.学术开放获取期刊的创新特征研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 16;13(4):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1802.
10
Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge.“象群”胜过“财神”:迈向公有学术知识
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jul 19;10(7):230207. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230207. eCollection 2023 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospects of digital scientific publishing on blockchain: The concept of DAP.区块链上数字科学出版的前景:数字学术出版协议(DAP)的概念。
Open Res Eur. 2024 Nov 27;3:117. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15771.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Towards the year 2049: The next 25 years of occupational health and safety research.迈向 2049 年:未来 25 年的职业健康与安全研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Dec 1;50(8):581-587. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4200. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge.“象群”胜过“财神”:迈向公有学术知识

本文引用的文献

1
Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge.“象群”胜过“财神”:迈向公有学术知识
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jul 19;10(7):230207. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230207. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Current market rates for scholarly publishing services.当前学术出版服务的市场费率。
F1000Res. 2021 Jan 12;10:20. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27468.2. eCollection 2021.
3
Beware performative reproducibility.谨防表演性可重复性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jul 19;10(7):230207. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230207. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):151. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01824-z.
4
Pandemic researchers - recruit your own best critics.大流行研究人员——招募你自己最出色的批评者。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7807):121. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01392-8.
5
Reliable novelty: New should not trump true.可靠新颖性:新不应胜过真。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 12;17(2):e3000117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000117. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences.生命科学领域未来科学出版的建议。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 12;17(2):e3000116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000116. eCollection 2019 Feb.
7
Ten tips for spotting industry involvement in science policy.识别科学界参与科学政策制定的十大技巧。
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054386. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
8
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability.著名科学期刊甚至难以达到平均可靠性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 20;12:37. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. eCollection 2018.