Evaluation of Different Surgical Techniques for Revision Cubital Tunnel Release: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Symptoms.

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the best option for revision surgery in refractory cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of revision surgery and determine the optimal surgical approach for patients requiring revision surgery for CuTS.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted. Characteristics of the included studies were summarized descriptively. The risk ratio between patient-reported preoperative and postoperative outcomes relating to pain, motor, and sensory deficits was calculated. A meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the postoperative symptom improvements based on the type of secondary surgery. Random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics were used when appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 471 patients were evaluated in 20 studies. In total, 254 (53.9%) male and 217 (46.1%) female patients, with an average age of 49.2 ± 14.1 years, were included in this study. Pain was the most common symptom (n = 346, 81.6%), followed by sensory and motor dysfunction in 342 (80.6%) and 223 (52.6%) patients, respectively. Meta-analysis comparing preoperative and postoperative symptoms between patients who had submuscular transposition (SMT), subcutaneous transposition (SCT), and neurolysis showed that a significant subgroup difference exists between the types of revision surgery in sensory and motor improvements. Meta-regression showed that SMT was associated with better outcomes compared with SCT in motor and sensory improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision surgery for CuTS can be useful for addressing recurrent and persistent symptoms. Compared with neurolysis and SCT, SMT seems to be the superior option for revision surgery, demonstrating substantial improvement in all symptom domains.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.