• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准评估肺动脉高压治疗耐受性:口服塞乐西帕的现用和曾用患者定性研究结果。

Use of the National Cancer Institute Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess treatment tolerability in pulmonary arterial hypertension: qualitative patient research findings in current and former users of oral selexipag.

机构信息

Janssen Global Services, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.

RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Dec 18;7(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00673-w.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-023-00673-w
PMID:38108945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10728389/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding patients' perspectives regarding drug tolerability, in addition to effectiveness, provides a complete picture of the patient experience and supports more informed therapeutic decision-making. The item library of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to measure patient-reported frequency, severity, and interference of adverse events (AEs) associated with cancer therapies. This qualitative interview study assessed the suitability of items selected from the PRO-CTCAE library for assessing tolerability of selexipag, a medication targeting the prostacyclin pathway for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

METHODS

Two rounds of 10 qualitative, web-assisted telephone interviews following a semi-structured guide were conducted in individuals with recent experience taking oral selexipag for PAH. Each interview included concept elicitation to gather participants' perspectives on symptomatic AEs (type, frequency, severity, and interference) and cognitive debriefing of PRO-CTCAE items addressing the most frequently reported AEs of oral selexipag.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 20 participants with PAH (mean [range] age 50 [24-68] years; 75% female; 85% in World Health Organization Functional Class II-III), comprising different races/ethnicities, levels of education, and employment status. Fifteen participants were currently treated with selexipag; five had taken selexipag for ≥ 6 months before discontinuing. The most frequently reported AEs included headache, jaw pain, and nausea (n = 15, 12, and 10 participants, respectively). Diarrhea and headache were identified as the most bothersome AEs by 5 and 4 participants, respectively. Some AEs were transitory (e.g., jaw pain); others were long-lasting (e.g., muscle pain). Based on findings from Round 1 interviews, a flushing item was added and the PRO-CTCAE general pain item was modified to be specific to jaw pain for testing in Round 2. Interview findings identified the following AEs as relevant to assess in a PAH clinical trial: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, flushing, jaw pain, headache, aching muscles, and aching joints.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRO-CTCAE items selected in this study and the additional symptomatic AEs identified as patient-relevant have the potential to be included in assessments capturing the patient perspective on tolerability in future studies of selexipag and possibly other PAH therapies.

摘要

背景

除了疗效之外,了解患者对药物耐受性的看法可以全面了解患者的体验,并支持更明智的治疗决策。国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版常见不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的项目库是为了衡量与癌症治疗相关的不良事件(AE)的患者报告频率、严重程度和干扰程度而开发的。这项定性访谈研究评估了从 PRO-CTCAE 库中选择的项目是否适合评估用于治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)的塞立生帕的耐受性。

方法

对最近服用口服塞立生帕治疗 PAH 的患者进行了两轮各 10 次的基于网络的电话定性访谈,访谈遵循半结构化指南。每次访谈均包括概念引出,以收集参与者对症状性 AE(类型、频率、严重程度和干扰)的看法,并对 PRO-CTCAE 中涉及口服塞立生帕最常报告的 AE 的项目进行认知审查。

结果

共对 20 名 PAH 患者(平均[范围]年龄 50[24-68]岁;75%为女性;85%为世界卫生组织功能分类 II-III)进行了访谈,他们来自不同种族/民族、教育程度和就业状况。15 名参与者目前正在接受塞立生帕治疗;5 名参与者在停止治疗前至少服用了 6 个月的塞立生帕。报告频率最高的 AE 包括头痛、下颌痛和恶心(分别有 15、12 和 10 名参与者报告)。腹泻和头痛分别被 5 名和 4 名参与者认为是最困扰的 AE。一些 AE 是短暂的(例如,下颌痛);另一些则是长期的(例如,肌肉疼痛)。基于第一轮访谈的结果,增加了潮红项目,并修改了 PRO-CTCAE 一般疼痛项目,使其专门针对下颌疼痛,用于第二轮测试。访谈结果确定了与评估 PAH 临床试验中相关的以下 AE:恶心、呕吐、腹泻、潮红、下颌痛、头痛、肌肉疼痛和关节疼痛。

结论

本研究中选择的 PRO-CTCAE 项目和确定的其他与症状相关的 AE 具有潜在的可能性,可用于评估塞立生帕和可能的其他 PAH 治疗药物的耐受性方面的患者观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/250c/10728389/0096b20d0fac/41687_2023_673_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/250c/10728389/0096b20d0fac/41687_2023_673_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/250c/10728389/0096b20d0fac/41687_2023_673_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of the National Cancer Institute Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess treatment tolerability in pulmonary arterial hypertension: qualitative patient research findings in current and former users of oral selexipag.采用国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准评估肺动脉高压治疗耐受性:口服塞乐西帕的现用和曾用患者定性研究结果。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Dec 18;7(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00673-w.
2
Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).对美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)进行认知访谈。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):257-69. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0470-1. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
3
Integrating the patient voice with clinician reports to identify a hepatocellular carcinoma-specific subset of treatment-related symptomatic adverse events.整合患者反馈与临床医生报告,以识别肝细胞癌特异性的治疗相关症状性不良事件亚组。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Aug 22;2:35. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0063-4. eCollection 2017.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局通用术语标准不良事件的韩语版的可靠性和有效性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 May;59(5):1082-1088.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
5
Identifying symptomatic adverse events using the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion mutations.使用患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准识别表皮生长因子受体外显子 20 插入突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的有症状不良事件。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):5494-5505. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5376. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
6
Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).使用美国国家癌症研究所的患者报告结局版常见不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE),对癌症临床研究中的症状性不良事件进行患者自由文本报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):276-285. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy169.
7
Prostacyclin for pulmonary arterial hypertension.前列环素用于肺动脉高压
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 1;5(5):CD012785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012785.pub2.
8
Temporarily switching from oral to intravenous selexipag in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic results from an open-label, phase III study.在肺动脉高压患者中从口服转为静脉注射塞乐昔帕:一项开放标签、III 期研究的安全性、耐受性和药代动力学结果。
Respir Res. 2021 Feb 3;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01594-8.
9
Safety and tolerability of transition from inhaled treprostinil to oral selexipag in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from the TRANSIT-1 study.从吸入性曲前列尼尔转换为口服塞来昔帕治疗肺动脉高压的安全性和耐受性:TRANSIT-1 研究结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Jan;38(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Cognitive Interview-Based Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Adolescents with Cancer.基于认知访谈的癌症青少年患者报告不良事件通用术语标准结局版本的验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):759-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.006. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with selexipag in real-world settings from the SPHERE registry (SelexiPag: tHe usErs dRug rEgistry).真实世界登记研究 SPHERE 中使用塞乐西帕治疗的肺动脉高压患者的疾病特征、治疗方法和结局(塞乐西帕:使用者药物登记研究)。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Feb;43(2):272-283. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.016. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Feasibility of a new electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for an advanced therapy clinical trial in immune-mediated inflammatory disease (PROmics): protocol for a qualitative feasibility study.一种新型电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统用于免疫介导的炎症性疾病(PROmics)的先进治疗临床试验的可行性:定性可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e063199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063199.
3
2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension.2022年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会肺动脉高压诊断和治疗指南。
Eur Respir J. 2023 Jan 6;61(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00879-2022. Print 2023 Jan.
4
Frequency of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Exploratory Online Survey.类风湿关节炎症状性不良反应的频率:一项探索性在线调查。
J Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;49(9):998-1005. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210688. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
The value of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials.患者报告结局在早期临床试验中的价值。
Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):18-20. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01648-4.
6
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.肺动脉高压
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2361-2376. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2000348.
7
Development of the Pulmonary Hypertension Functional Classification Self-Report: a patient version adapted from the World Health Organization Functional Classification measure.肺动脉高压功能分类自评量表的制定:基于世界卫生组织功能分类量表改编的患者自评版本。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Aug 24;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01782-0.
8
Drug tolerability: How much ambiguity can be tolerated? A systematic review of the assessment of tolerability in clinical studies.药物耐受性:可以容忍多大程度的模糊性?临床研究中耐受性评估的系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(2):551-565. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15016. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
Composite grading algorithm for the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的综合分级算法。
Clin Trials. 2021 Feb;18(1):104-114. doi: 10.1177/1740774520975120. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
10
United States Pulmonary Hypertension Scientific Registry: Baseline Characteristics.美国肺动脉高压科学注册中心:基线特征。
Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):311-327. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.088. Epub 2020 Aug 26.