Suppr超能文献

血管内超声引导下外周血管介入治疗股腘动脉周围血管疾病患者的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular interventions in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease.

机构信息

Klinikum Arnsberg GmbH, Karolinen-Hospital, Arnsberg-Hüsten, Germany.

Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Vasa. 2024 Apr;53(2):135-144. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001109. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) might offer clinical benefits compared to angiography-guided PTA in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). A cost-effectiveness model was developed to examine the benefits and costs of IVUS-guided PTA versus angiography-guided PTA in PAD patients with femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease. A two-step model (a one-year decision tree followed by a lifetime semi-Markov model) was developed from a German healthcare payer perspective to estimate the costs and outcomes over a one-year and lifetime horizon. Clinical events included target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation, and death. Transition probabilities and utility values were derived from published literature. Healthcare costs were based on German Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) codes. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. In the one-year horizon, IVUS-guided PTA resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs of 0.02 and €919 per patient respectively, with a corresponding ICER of €45,195/QALY gained versus angiography-guided PTA. In the lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PTA outperforms angiography-guided PTA; it was associated with a cost saving of €46 per patient and incremental QALY of 0.22. Utility value for post-TLR, as well as probabilities of death and TLR had the greatest impact on the one-year ICER, while cost of TLR and probabilities of TLR and amputation influenced the lifetime ICER most. The probability of IVUS-guided PTA being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY was 50.4% in the one-year horizon and increased to 85.9% in the lifetime horizon. In this analysis IVUS-guided PTA among patients with symptomatic FP atherosclerosis was cost-saving in a lifetime horizon from the German healthcare payer perspective.

摘要

血管内超声(IVUS)引导经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)可能比血管造影引导的 PTA 为外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者带来临床获益。本研究建立了一个成本效益模型,以评估血管内超声引导 PTA 与血管造影引导 PTA 在股腘动脉(FP)闭塞性病变 PAD 患者中的获益和成本。从德国医疗保健支付者的角度出发,采用两步模型(一年决策树,随后是终生半马尔可夫模型)来估计一年和终生的成本和结果。临床事件包括靶病变血运重建(TLR)、截肢和死亡。转移概率和效用值来自已发表的文献。医疗保健成本基于德国诊断相关组(DRG)代码。成本和结果以每年 3%的贴现率贴现。计算增量成本效益比(ICER),并进行敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。在一年的时间内,IVUS 引导的 PTA 导致每例患者分别增加 0.02 个质量调整生命年(QALY)和 919 欧元的成本,与血管造影引导的 PTA 相比,增量成本效益比为 45195 欧元/QALY。在终生的时间内,IVUS 引导的 PTA 优于血管造影引导的 PTA;与每例患者节省 46 欧元的成本和增加 0.22 个 QALY 相关。TLR 后的效用值以及死亡和 TLR 的概率对一年 ICER 的影响最大,而 TLR 和截肢的概率和成本对终生 ICER 的影响最大。在一年的时间内,在愿意支付(WTP)阈值为 50000 欧元/QALY 的情况下,IVUS 引导的 PTA 具有成本效益的概率为 50.4%,在终生的时间内,这一概率增加到 85.9%。在这项分析中,从德国医疗保健支付者的角度来看,IVUS 引导的 PTA 在股腘动脉粥样硬化症状性患者的终生时间内是节省成本的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验