Suppr超能文献

大鼠未表现出前瞻性信息寻求的证据:一项初步研究。

Rats did not show evidence of prospective information-seeking: a pilot study.

作者信息

Iwasaki Sumie, Taniuchi Tohru

机构信息

Institute of Human and Social Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Dec 4;17:1253780. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1253780. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Information-seeking behavior often features in research on metacognition in non-human animals; some species seek more information when they do not know the location of a food reward. Rats are known to do this in situations of uncertainty, but it is still unclear if they seek information prospectively for solving a later problem. In this study, we investigated rats' information-seeking responses in two areas that presented different cognitive challenges ( = 4). In one area, a memory task was presented in which rats could access a cue for a food reward during the information-seeking phase of a trial, but the cue was removed before the subsequent test phase. In the other area, a discrimination task presented a cue that was available in both the information-seeking and the test phases, so that it was not necessary to seek information prospectively. The memory and discrimination test trials were given in quasi-random order (Experiment 1). Rats explored in the memory task area no more than in the discrimination task area during the information-seeking phase, even after extensive training. When they were exposed exclusively to the memory task over multiple sessions (Experiment 2), they developed a strategy of exploring the available object cues. In Experiment 3, rats were found to stay longer in an area, which had an object than in other, less potentially informative areas; they were sensitive to the presence of information. Although these results did not support the existence of prospective information-seeking in rats, they do not necessarily imply that rats lack related abilities. This consideration is due to the constraints of the small sample size and the limited scope of the testing environment. Accumulating not only positive but also negative evidence would further understanding of the factors influencing metacognitive responses in non-human animals.

摘要

信息寻求行为常常是关于非人类动物元认知研究的特征;一些物种在不知道食物奖励位置时会寻求更多信息。众所周知,大鼠在不确定的情况下会这样做,但它们是否为解决后续问题而前瞻性地寻求信息仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了大鼠在呈现不同认知挑战的两个区域(n = 4)中的信息寻求反应。在一个区域,呈现了一个记忆任务,在试验的信息寻求阶段大鼠可以获取食物奖励的线索,但在随后的测试阶段之前该线索被移除。在另一个区域,一个辨别任务呈现了一个在信息寻求和测试阶段都可用的线索,因此没有必要前瞻性地寻求信息。记忆和辨别测试试验以准随机顺序进行(实验1)。即使经过广泛训练,大鼠在信息寻求阶段在记忆任务区域的探索也不超过在辨别任务区域的探索。当它们在多个实验环节中仅接触记忆任务时(实验2),它们形成了一种探索可用物体线索的策略。在实验3中,发现大鼠在有物体的区域停留的时间比在其他潜在信息较少的区域更长;它们对信息的存在很敏感。尽管这些结果不支持大鼠存在前瞻性信息寻求,但它们不一定意味着大鼠缺乏相关能力。这种考虑是由于样本量小和测试环境范围有限的限制。积累不仅是正面的而且是负面的证据将进一步有助于理解影响非人类动物元认知反应的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df08/10725935/45bd7d093e17/fnbeh-17-1253780-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验