• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测病态肥胖患者的喉镜检查和/或插管困难:上唇咬试验与改良 Mallampati 分级。

Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and/or intubation among morbidly obese patients: Upper lip bite test versus modified Mallampati classification.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

Saint-Joseph University Medical School, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

J Perioper Pract. 2024 Nov;34(11):347-356. doi: 10.1177/17504589231206903. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1177/17504589231206903
PMID:38112112
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aim to compare the upper lip bite test with the modified Mallampati test as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation among morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

A total of 500 morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m) undergoing general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are included in this prospective single-blinded observational clinical study. The preoperative airway assessment is obtained by the modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. The difficulty of laryngoscopy is assessed by an experienced anaesthetist in patients adequately anaesthetised and fully relaxed. The view is classified according to Cormack and Lehane's classification. Modified Mallampati test III or IV and upper lip bite test III are considered positive tests. Difficult laryngoscopy is defined as Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV, whereas difficult endotracheal intubation is defined as an intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5.

RESULTS

The incidences of Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV and intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5 are 9.4% and 11.8% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy are higher with the upper lip bite test. The combination of the upper lip bite test and the modified Mallampati test improved these measures. The likelihood ratio + was significantly higher for the upper lip bite test (6.35 and 9.47) than for the modified Mallampati test (3.21 and 3.16).

CONCLUSION

The upper lip bite test is a test with high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy making it a favourable test for identifying easy and difficult intubations and laryngoscopies in morbidly obese patients.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较上唇咬合试验与改良 Mallampati 试验,以预测病态肥胖患者中困难喉镜检查和/或困难插管的情况。

方法

本前瞻性单盲观察性临床研究共纳入 500 例病态肥胖(BMI>40kg/m²)患者,这些患者均在全身麻醉下进行气管插管。术前气道评估采用改良 Mallampati 试验和上唇咬合试验进行。在充分麻醉和完全放松的患者中,由经验丰富的麻醉师评估喉镜检查的难度。根据 Cormack 和 Lehane 的分类来评估视野。改良 Mallampati 试验 III 或 IV 级和上唇咬合试验 III 级被认为是阳性试验。困难喉镜检查定义为 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级 III 或 IV 级,而困难气管内插管定义为插管困难评分 ⩾5 分。

结果

Cormack 和 Lehane 分级 III 或 IV 级和插管困难评分 ⩾5 分的发生率分别为 9.4%和 11.8%。上唇咬合试验的特异性、阳性预测值和准确性更高。上唇咬合试验与改良 Mallampati 试验相结合提高了这些指标。上唇咬合试验的优势比 (+) 显著高于改良 Mallampati 试验(6.35 和 9.47)。

结论

上唇咬合试验是一种具有高灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和准确性的试验,非常适合识别病态肥胖患者中容易和困难的插管和喉镜检查。

相似文献

1
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and/or intubation among morbidly obese patients: Upper lip bite test versus modified Mallampati classification.预测病态肥胖患者的喉镜检查和/或插管困难:上唇咬试验与改良 Mallampati 分级。
J Perioper Pract. 2024 Nov;34(11):347-356. doi: 10.1177/17504589231206903. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Predictive Value of Modified Mallampati Test and Upper Lip Bite Test Concerning Cormack and Lehane's Laryngoscopy Grading in the Anticipation of Difficult Intubation: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.改良马兰帕蒂试验和上唇咬试验对预测科马克和莱汉内喉镜分级中困难插管的价值:印度布巴内斯瓦尔一家三级护理医院的横断面研究
Cureus. 2022 Sep 3;14(9):e28754. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28754. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Evaluation of the reliability of the upper lip bite test and the modified mallampati test in predicting difficult intubation under direct laryngoscopy in apparently normal patients: a prospective observational clinical study.评估上唇咬诊和改良 Mallampati 试验在预测直接喉镜下貌似正常患者插管困难中的可靠性:一项前瞻性观察性临床研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01855-7.
4
PREDICTION OF DIFFICULT INTUBATION BY USING UPPER LIP BITE, THYROMENTAL DISTANCE AND MALLAMPATI SCORE IN COMPARISON TO CORMACK AND LEHANE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.通过比较上唇咬、甲状软骨切迹距离和 Mallampati 评分与 Cormack 和 Lehane 分类系统,预测困难插管。
Wiad Lek. 2021;74(9 pt 2):2305-2314.
5
Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.气道体格检查用于检测表面上正常的成年患者的困难气道管理情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 15;5(5):CD008874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008874.pub2.
6
Comparison of upper lip bite test with Mallampati test in the prediction of difficult intubation at a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan.巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院中,上唇咬试验与马兰帕蒂试验在预测困难插管方面的比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Oct;62(10):1012-5.
7
A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: a prospective blinded study.上唇咬试验(一种简单的新技术)与改良Mallampati分类法在预测气管插管困难方面的比较:一项前瞻性盲法研究。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):595-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00053.
8
Upper lip bite test versus Modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and/or intubation among morbidly obese patients.在上唇咬试验与改良马兰帕蒂分级法对病态肥胖患者困难喉镜检查和/或插管的预测作用比较
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109761. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109761. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
9
Upper lip bite test compared to modified Mallampati test in predicting difficult airway in obstetrics: A prospective observational study.上唇咬试验与改良马兰帕蒂试验在预测产科困难气道中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Perioper Pract. 2023 Apr;33(4):116-121. doi: 10.1177/17504589211045231. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Predicting difficult laryngoscopy in acromegaly: a comparison of upper lip bite test with modified Mallampati classification.预测肢端肥大症患者行喉镜检查的难度:上唇咬诊与改良 Mallampati 分级的比较。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Apr;22(2):138-43. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181ce6a60.