Korvalan P, Marinov M F, Vodas K
Vet Med Nauki. 1986;23(9):77-80.
Studied was the survival and penetration capacity of bull spermatozoa frozen after the following technologies--pellet, straw, and minitube--and the results obtained were compared via biologic experiments. The minitube technology of freezing the semen led to higher thermal resistance of the spermatozoa as against freezing in the form of straws and pallets (363.5 +/- 8.02 min, 356.25 +/- 7.79 min, and 339.00 +/- 8.44 min, respectively). The differences established were statistically highly significant (P less than 0.001). The penetration capacity of spermatozoa in an estral secretion of cows was highest at freezing in the form of minitubes (1.70 +/- 0.54 mm/min). The same was lower with straws (1.53 +/- 0.02 mm/min), and lowest--with pellets (1.52 +/- 0.04 mm/min). The differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.01). The fertilization capacity of spermatozoa frozen with the employment of the three technologies was best with the use of minitubes and straws--50.20, resp., 49.67 per cent, and lowest with the use of pellets--45.22 per cent.
研究了采用颗粒、细管和迷你管等技术冷冻后的公牛精子的存活能力和穿透能力,并通过生物学实验对所得结果进行了比较。与以细管和颗粒形式冷冻相比,精液的迷你管冷冻技术使精子具有更高的耐热性(分别为363.5±8.02分钟、356.25±7.79分钟和339.00±8.44分钟)。所确定的差异在统计学上具有高度显著性(P<0.001)。精子在母牛发情分泌物中的穿透能力在以迷你管形式冷冻时最高(1.70±0.54毫米/分钟)。细管冷冻时该能力较低(1.53±0.02毫米/分钟),颗粒冷冻时最低(1.52±0.04毫米/分钟)。差异具有统计学显著性(P<0.01)。采用这三种技术冷冻的精子的受精能力,使用迷你管和细管时最佳,分别为50.20%和49.67%,使用颗粒时最低,为45.22%。