Suppr超能文献

基于贝叶斯的依托咪酯靶控输注中使用 qCON 作为控制变量的咨询工具的实现。

Implementation of a Bayesian based advisory tool for target-controlled infusion of propofol using qCON as control variable.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

NeuroAnesthesia and NeuroIntensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria, 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Apr;38(2):519-529. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01106-1. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

Abstract

This single blinded randomized controlled trial aims to assess whether the application of a Bayesian-adjusted Ce (effect-site of propofol) advisory tool leads towards a more stringent control of the cerebral drug effect during anaesthesia, using qCON as control variable. 100 patients scheduled for elective surgery were included and randomized into a control or intervention group (1:1 ratio). In the intervention group the advisory screen was made available to the clinician, whereas it was blinded in the control group. The settings of the target-controlled infusion pumps could be adjusted at any time by the clinician. Cerebral drug effect was quantified using processed EEG (CONOX monitor, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany). The time of qCON between the desired range (35-55) during anaesthesia maintenance was defined as our primary end point. Induction parameters and recovery times were considered secondary end points and coefficient of variance of qCON and Ce was calculated in order to survey the extent of control towards the mean of the population. The desired range of qCON between 35 and 55 was maintained in 84% vs. 90% (p = 0.15) of the case time in the control versus intervention group, respectively. Secondary endpoints showed similar results in both groups. The coefficient of variation for Ce was higher in the intervention group. The application of the Bayesian-based Ce advisory system in this trial did not result in a different time of qCON between 35 and 55 (84 [21] vs. 90 [18] percent of the case time). Significant differences between groups were hard to establish, most likely due to a very high performance level in the control group. More extensive control efforts were found in the intervention group. We believe that this advisory tool could be a useful educational tool for novices to titrate propofol effect-site concentrations.

摘要

这项单盲随机对照临床试验旨在评估在麻醉期间使用贝叶斯调整的 Ce(丙泊酚效应部位)咨询工具是否能更严格地控制脑药物效应,以 qCON 作为控制变量。纳入了 100 名择期手术患者,并随机分为对照组和干预组(1:1 比例)。在干预组,临床医生可以使用咨询屏幕,而在对照组则对其进行盲法处理。靶控输注泵的设置可以由临床医生随时调整。脑药物效应使用经处理的 EEG(CONOX 监测仪,Fresenius Kabi,Bad Homburg,德国)进行量化。麻醉维持期间 qCON 达到所需范围(35-55)的时间是我们的主要终点。诱导参数和恢复时间被认为是次要终点,并且计算 qCON 和 Ce 的变异系数,以评估对人群平均值的控制程度。在对照组和干预组中,qCON 分别在 84%和 90%(p = 0.15)的病例时间内维持在 35-55 的所需范围内。两组的次要终点结果相似。干预组 Ce 的变异系数更高。在本试验中,贝叶斯 Ce 咨询系统的应用并未导致 35-55 之间 qCON 的时间不同(干预组为 84 [21]%,对照组为 90 [18]%的病例时间)。两组之间的差异难以确立,这很可能是由于对照组的表现非常出色。干预组的控制力度更大。我们认为,该咨询工具可能是新手滴定丙泊酚效应部位浓度的有用教育工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验