Zhang Yueqing, Zhou Yunqiao, Dong Ruochen, Song Ninghui, Hong Minghui, Li Juying, Yu Jia, Kong Deyang
Key Laboratory of Pesticide Environmental Assessment and Pollution Control, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China.
State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Mar 5;465:133270. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133270. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
The increasing applications of emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have raised global concern. However, the release of emerging PFAS from the fluorochemical industry remains unclear. Herein, the occurrence of 48 emerging and legacy PFAS in wastewater from 10 fluorochemical manufacturers and mass flows of PFAS in a centralized wastewater treatment plant were investigated. Their distribution and ecological risk in neighboring riverine water were also evaluated. In wastewater from fluorochemical manufacturers, PFAS concentrations were in the range of 14,700-5200,000 ng/L and 2 H,2 H-perfluorooctanoic acid (6:2 FTCA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamide (N-EtFOSA), and 1 H,1 H,2 H,2 H-perfluorodecanesulfonate (8:2 FTS) were the major PFAS detected. Several PFAS displayed increased mass flows after wastewater treatment, especially PFOA and 6:2 FTCA. The mass flows of PFAS increased from - 20% to 233% after the activated sludge system but decreased by only 0-13% after the activated carbon filtration. In riverine water, PFAS concentrations were in the range of 5900-39,100 ng/L and 6:2 FTCA, 1 H,1 H,2 H,2 H-perfluorodecyl phosphate monoester (8:2 monoPAP), 1 H,1 H,2 H,2 H-perfluorooctyl phosphate monoester (6:2 monoPAP), PFOA, and perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) were the major PFAS detected. PFOA and 6:2 FTCA exhibited comparable hazard quotients for ecological risk. Current wastewater treatment processes cannot fully remove various PFAS discharged by fluorochemical manufacturers, and further investigations on their risk are needed for better chemical management.
新型全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的应用日益广泛,引发了全球关注。然而,氟化工行业中新型PFAS的排放情况仍不明确。在此,对10家氟化工制造商废水中48种新型和传统PFAS的存在情况以及一家集中式污水处理厂中PFAS的质量流量进行了调查。还评估了它们在邻近河流水体中的分布及生态风险。在氟化工制造商的废水中,PFAS浓度范围为14700 - 5200000 ng/L,主要检测到的PFAS为2H,2H - 全氟辛酸(6:2 FTCA)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、N - 乙基全氟辛烷磺酰胺(N - EtFOSA)和1H,1H,2H,2H - 全氟癸烷磺酸(8:2 FTS)。经过污水处理后,几种PFAS的质量流量有所增加,尤其是PFOA和6:2 FTCA。活性污泥系统处理后,PFAS的质量流量增加了 - 20%至233%,而活性炭过滤后仅减少了0 - 13%。在河流水体中,PFAS浓度范围为5900 - 39100 ng/L,主要检测到的PFAS为6:2 FTCA、1H,1H,2H,2H - 全氟癸基磷酸单酯(8:2 monoPAP)、1H,1H,2H,2H - 全氟辛基磷酸单酯(6:2 monoPAP)、PFOA和全氟己酸(PFHxA)。PFOA和6:2 FTCA在生态风险方面表现出相当的危害商数。当前的污水处理工艺无法完全去除氟化工制造商排放的各种PFAS,需要进一步研究其风险以实现更好的化学品管理。