Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Baicheng Medical College, Baicheng, China.
College of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036742.
Chronic prostatitis (CP) is a common condition that affects many individuals. Previous clinical trials have explored the use of moxibustion as a potential treatment for CP. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of moxibustion for CP remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the effects of moxibustion for CP.
In order to gather relevant and up-to-date information, we conducted a systematic literature search of databases including Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wangfang from inception until June 30, 2023. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of moxibustion for CP were included in this study. The primary outcomes of interest were the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) scores and the overall response rate. To evaluate the quality of the included studies, we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.
After analyzing the data from 8 RCTs involving a total of 664 patients, we found significant differences in NIH-CPSI scores between moxibustion and other treatment modalities. Specifically, when compared with herbal medicine, moxibustion was associated with a mean difference (MD) of -1.78 in NIH-CPSI scores (95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.78, -0.78], P < .001), and when compared with western medicine, moxibustion was associated with a MD of -5.24 in NIH-CPSI scores (95% CI [-7.80, -2.67], P < .08). In terms of the overall response rate, moxibustion was found to be superior to herbal medicine, with a MD of 2.36 (95% [19, 4.67], P = .01). Additionally, when moxibustion was combined with herbal medicine, it yielded a higher overall response rate with a MD of 4.07 (95% CI [1.54, 10.74], P = .005) compared to herbal medicine alone. Moxibustion also outperformed western medicine in terms of the overall response rate, with a MD of 4.56 (95% CI [2.24, 9.26], P < .001).
Based on the findings of this study, moxibustion appears to be a potentially efficacious treatment for CP. The results suggest that moxibustion can improve NIH-CPSI scores and overall response rate in patients with CP. However, further high-quality studies are needed to validate these results and establish the long-term effects of moxibustion as a treatment for CP.
慢性前列腺炎(CP)是一种常见的疾病,影响许多人。先前的临床试验已经探索了艾灸作为 CP 潜在治疗方法的作用。然而,艾灸治疗 CP 的疗效证据仍然有限。因此,本研究旨在全面评估艾灸治疗 CP 的效果。
为了收集相关和最新的信息,我们对包括 Cochrane Library、PUBMED、EMBASE、CNKI 和万方在内的数据库进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间从建库至 2023 年 6 月 30 日。本研究仅纳入艾灸治疗 CP 的随机临床试验(RCT)。主要结局指标为国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评分和总反应率。为了评估纳入研究的质量,我们使用了 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具。
对 8 项 RCT 共 664 名患者的数据进行分析后,我们发现艾灸与其他治疗方法在 NIH-CPSI 评分上存在显著差异。具体而言,与草药治疗相比,艾灸与 NIH-CPSI 评分的平均差值(MD)为-1.78(95%置信区间[CI] [-2.78,-0.78],P <.001),与西药治疗相比,艾灸与 NIH-CPSI 评分的 MD 为-5.24(95%CI [-7.80,-2.67],P <.08)。就总反应率而言,艾灸优于草药治疗,MD 为 2.36(95%[19,4.67],P =.01)。此外,与单独使用草药治疗相比,艾灸联合草药治疗的总反应率更高,MD 为 4.07(95%CI [1.54,10.74],P =.005)。与西药治疗相比,艾灸在总反应率方面也表现更好,MD 为 4.56(95%CI [2.24,9.26],P <.001)。
基于本研究的结果,艾灸似乎是 CP 的一种潜在有效治疗方法。结果表明,艾灸可以改善 CP 患者的 NIH-CPSI 评分和总反应率。然而,需要进一步的高质量研究来验证这些结果,并确定艾灸作为 CP 治疗方法的长期效果。