Department of Clinical Diagnostic Oncology, Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Clinical Research Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Front Immunol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1308381. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1308381. eCollection 2023.
Currently, first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, are utilized as monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (≧50%). Pre-treatment or post-treatment serum soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) has been identified as a potential biomarker for assessing ICI efficacy through fixed-point observations. However, existing studies on sPD-L1 changes have produced inconsistent results or have had sample sizes too small to detect clinically meaningful effect sizes. To elucidate the role of sPD-L1, we conducted a collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis of PD-1 inhibitor treatments.
We conducted a thorough search of articles in PubMed via Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to October 20, 2023. Trials were deemed eligible if they contained individual datasets for advanced NSCLC patients, including data on overall survival (OS)/progression-free survival (PFS), as well as pre- and post-treatment sPD-L1 levels after 3-4 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. Our analysis focused on patients who completed 3-4 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. The primary outcome measure was OS/PFS, and we assessed changes in sPD-L1 concentration pre- and post-treatment through ELISA analyses.
From our search, we identified a potential seven trials, encompassing 256 patients. Among these, two trials with 26 patients met the criteria for inclusion in our primary analyses. Over a median follow-up period of 10 months, pooled univariate analysis revealed that increases in sPD-L1 levels during PD-1 inhibitor treatment were not associated with OS (HR = 1.25; CI: 0.52-3.02)/PFS (HR = 1.42; CI: 0.61-3.30) when compared to cases with sPD-L1 decreases. Subgroup analyses indicated that the impact of sPD-L1 changes on overall mortality/progression-related mortality remained consistent regardless of gender, age, or the type of treatment (nivolumab or pembrolizumab).
Our findings suggest that changes in sPD-L1 levels during PD-1 inhibitor treatment do not significantly influence the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients, regardless of gender, age, or treatment type. Continuous monitoring of sPD-L1 may not offer significant advantages compared to fixed-point observations.
目前,包括程序性死亡蛋白-1(PD-1)抑制剂在内的一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)被用于高程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)表达(≧50%)的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的单药治疗。治疗前或治疗后血清可溶性 PD-L1(sPD-L1)已被确定为通过固定点观察评估 ICI 疗效的潜在生物标志物。然而,现有的 sPD-L1 变化研究结果不一致,或者样本量太小,无法检测到有临床意义的效应大小。为了阐明 sPD-L1 的作用,我们对 PD-1 抑制剂治疗进行了 PD-1 抑制剂治疗的协作个体患者数据荟萃分析。
我们通过 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库对 PubMed 中的文章进行了全面搜索,检索时间从 2023 年 10 月 20 日开始。如果试验包含晚期 NSCLC 患者的个体数据集,包括总生存期(OS)/无进展生存期(PFS)以及 PD-1 抑制剂治疗 3-4 个周期后治疗前和治疗后的 sPD-L1 水平的数据,则认为该试验符合入选标准。我们的分析重点是完成 3-4 个周期 PD-1 抑制剂治疗的患者。主要观察指标是 OS/PFS,我们通过 ELISA 分析评估治疗前后 sPD-L1 浓度的变化。
通过搜索,我们确定了有潜在的 7 项试验,涵盖了 256 名患者。其中,有 2 项试验的 26 名患者符合我们主要分析的纳入标准。在中位随访 10 个月期间,汇总的单变量分析显示,与 sPD-L1 降低的病例相比,PD-1 抑制剂治疗期间 sPD-L1 水平的升高与 OS(HR=1.25;CI:0.52-3.02)/PFS(HR=1.42;CI:0.61-3.30)无关。亚组分析表明,sPD-L1 变化对总死亡率/与进展相关的死亡率的影响在性别、年龄或治疗类型(nivolumab 或 pembrolizumab)方面保持一致。
我们的研究结果表明,PD-1 抑制剂治疗期间 sPD-L1 水平的变化对晚期 NSCLC 患者的预后没有显著影响,无论性别、年龄或治疗类型如何。与固定点观察相比,连续监测 sPD-L1 可能没有显著优势。