Suppr超能文献

高剂量脉冲疗法与低剂量静脉注射甲泼尼龙对重症至危重症新型冠状病毒肺炎临床结局的疗效:一项随机临床试验

The Efficacy of High-Dose Pulse Therapy vs. Low-Dose Intravenous Methylprednisolone on Severe to Critical COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Sahraei Zahra, Panahi Parnaz, Solhjoukhah Kouroush, Mesbah Maryam, Afaghi Siamak, Amirdosara Mahdi, Salamzadeh Jamshid, Esmaeili Tarki Farzad, Alavi Darazam Ilad

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Pharm Res. 2023 Aug 26;22(1):e137838. doi: 10.5812/ijpr-137838. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear which formulation of the corticosteroid regimen has the optimum efficacies on COVID-19 pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of 2 different regimens in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19: Methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg every 12 hours (low-dose group) and 1000 mg/day pulse therapy for 3 days following 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone every 12 hours (high-dose group).

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, patients with mild to moderate ARDS due to COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose (n = 47) or high-dose (n = 48) intravenous methylprednisolone regimens. Two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophil/lymphocyte, platelet, hemoglobin, and inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C-reactive protein [CRP], and ferritin). Both regimens were initiated upon admission and continued for 10 days. The clinical outcome and secondary complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Evaluating in-hospital outcomes, no difference was revealed in the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stays (5.4 ± 4.6 vs. 4.5 ± 4.9; P = 0.35), total hospital stays (8 ± 3.1 vs. 6.9 ± 3.4; P = 0.1), requirement rate for invasive ventilation (29.2% vs. 36.2%; P = 0.4) or non-invasive ventilation (16.6% vs 23.4%; P = 0.4), and hemoperfusion (16.6% vs 11.3%; P = 0.3) between the low- and high-dose groups. There was no significant difference in fatality due to ARDS (29.2% vs. 38.3%; P = 0.3) and septic shock (4.2% vs. 6.4%; P = 0.3) between the low- and high-dose groups. Patients in the high-dose group had significantly higher bacterial pneumonia co-infection events compared with those in the low-dose group (18.7% vs 10.6%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjuvant pulse therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone did not result in improved in-hospital clinical outcomes among patients with mild to moderate ARDS due to COVID-19. A higher risk of bacterial pneumonia should be considered in such cases as receiving a higher dose of steroids.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚哪种皮质类固醇治疗方案对新型冠状病毒肺炎具有最佳疗效。

目的

本研究旨在比较两种不同治疗方案治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的临床结局:每12小时静脉注射1 mg/kg甲泼尼龙(低剂量组)以及在每12小时静脉注射1 mg/kg甲泼尼龙基础上给予1000 mg/天脉冲治疗3天(高剂量组)。

方法

在这项随机临床试验中,将新型冠状病毒肺炎所致轻至中度ARDS患者随机分配接受低剂量(n = 47)或高剂量(n = 48)静脉注射甲泼尼龙治疗方案。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、白细胞、淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞、血小板、血红蛋白以及炎症标志物(红细胞沉降率[ESR]、C反应蛋白[CRP]和铁蛋白)方面进行匹配。两种治疗方案均在入院时开始,持续10天。评估临床结局和次要并发症。

结果

评估住院结局发现,低剂量组和高剂量组在重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(5.4±4.6天对4.5±4.9天;P = 0.35)、总住院时间(8±3.1天对6.9±3.4天;P = 0.1)、有创通气需求率(29.2%对36.2%;P = 0.4)或无创通气需求率(16.6%对23.4%;P = 0.4)以及血液灌流需求率(16.6%对11.3%;P = 0.3)方面均无差异。低剂量组和高剂量组因ARDS死亡(29.2%对38.3%;P = 0.3)以及感染性休克死亡(4.2%对6.4%;P = 0.3)方面均无显著差异。与低剂量组相比,高剂量组患者细菌肺炎合并感染事件显著更多(18.7%对10.6%;P = 0.01)。

结论

对于新型冠状病毒肺炎所致轻至中度ARDS患者,静脉注射甲泼尼龙辅助脉冲治疗并未改善住院临床结局。在接受更高剂量类固醇治疗的此类病例中,应考虑细菌肺炎风险更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e2a/10728836/2c193ebbc4ce/ijpr-22-1-137838-i001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验