Suppr超能文献

心室性心律失常频率定义的应用。

Application of a frequency definition of ventricular proarrhythmia.

作者信息

Morganroth J, Borland M, Chao G

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jan 1;59(1):97-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(87)80078-4.

Abstract

To differentiate spontaneous variability from proarrhythmia in patients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias, 495 patients with 2 or more Holter tracings during placebo therapy were evaluated. The Holter session with the highest frequency of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and ventricular tachycardia was compared with the first placebo recording. Patients were segregated by their baseline frequency of VPCs. The percent of patients taking placebo in this trial who had the same increase in VPC frequency as has been ascribed to those with proarrhythmia varied from 0 of 470 patients with a baseline frequency of ventricular arrhythmia of 10 to 50 VPCs/hour, 3 of 44 (7%) with 51 to 100 VPCs/hour, 1 of 139 (0.7%) with 101 to 300 VPCs/hour and 1 of 265 (0.04%) with more than 300 VPCs/hour. Overall, 5 of 496 (1%) patients would have been classified as having proarrhythmia using the algorithm although only placebo was given. A 10-fold or greater increase in ventricular tachycardia beats in patients taking placebo occurred in 9 of 274 patients (3%). Thus, a simple algorithm to define proarrhythmia in patients with mixed cardiac disease and chronic ventricular arrhythmias can be defined and differentiated from spontaneous variability. This arbitrary algorithm defines proarrhythmia as an increase of more than 3 times when baseline VPC frequency is more than 100 VPCs/hour and more than 10 times when that frequency is less than 100 VPCs/hour with a false-positive rate of only 1%.

摘要

为了区分良性或潜在致命性室性心律失常患者的自发变异性与致心律失常作用,对495例在安慰剂治疗期间有2次或更多次动态心电图记录的患者进行了评估。将室性早搏(VPC)和室性心动过速频率最高的动态心电图记录时段与首次安慰剂记录进行比较。患者按其VPC的基线频率进行分类。在该试验中,服用安慰剂且VPC频率增加幅度与致心律失常患者相同的患者百分比,在基线室性心律失常频率为每小时10至50次VPC的470例患者中为0,在每小时51至100次VPC的44例患者中有3例(7%),在每小时101至300次VPC的139例患者中有1例(0.7%),在每小时超过300次VPC的265例患者中有1例(0.04%)。总体而言,496例患者中有5例(1%)使用该算法会被归类为有致心律失常作用,尽管仅给予了安慰剂。服用安慰剂的患者中,室性心动过速搏动增加10倍或更多倍的情况在274例患者中有9例(3%)出现。因此,可以定义一种简单的算法来界定合并心脏病和慢性室性心律失常患者的致心律失常作用,并将其与自发变异性区分开来。这种任意算法将致心律失常作用定义为:当基线VPC频率超过每小时100次VPC时增加超过3倍,当频率低于每小时100次VPC时增加超过10倍,假阳性率仅为1%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验