Yousuf Omair K, Kennedy Kevin, Russo Andrea, Varosy Paul, Lindsay Bruce D, Steinberg Benjamin, Atwater Brett D, Calkins Hugh, Spertus John A
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; Carient Heart & Vascular, Manassas, Virginia; Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Fairfax, Virginia; University of Virginia Health, Manassas, Virginia.
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Apr;21(4):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
The appropriate use criteria (AUCs) are a diverse group of indications aimed to better evaluate the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
The purpose of this study was to quantify the proportion of ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) implants as appropriate, may be appropriate (MA), or rarely appropriate (RA) on the basis of the AUC guidelines.
This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing ICD implantation between April 2018 and March 2019 at >1500 US hospitals. The appropriateness of ICD implants was adjudicated using the AUC.
Of 309,318 ICDs, 241,438 were primary prevention implants (78.1%) and 67,880 secondary prevention implants (21.9%); 243,532 (79%) were mappable to the AUC. For primary prevention, 185,431 ICDs (96.4%) were appropriate, 5660 (2.9%) MA, and 1205 (0.6%) RA. For secondary prevention, 47,498 ICDs (92.7%) were appropriate, 2581 (5%) MA, and 1157 (2.3%) RA. A significant number of RA devices were implanted in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure who were ineligible for advanced therapies (53.9%) and those with myocardial infarction within 40 days (18.1%). The appropriateness of the pacing lead was more variable, with 48,470 dual-chamber ICD implants (62%) being classified as appropriate, 29,209 (37.4%) MA, and 448 (0.6%) RA. Among CRT-D implants, 63,848 (82.2%) were appropriate, 9900 (12.7%) MA, and 3940 (5.1%) RA for left ventricular pacing. A total of 99,754 implants were deemed appropriate but excluded from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination. More than 92% of hospitals had an RA implant rate of <4%.
In this large national registry, 95% of mappable ICD and CRT-D implants were considered appropriate, with <2% of RA implants. Nearly 100,000 appropriate implants are excluded by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination.
适当使用标准(AUCs)是一组旨在更好地评估植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗益处的多样化适应症。
本研究的目的是根据AUC指南量化ICD和心脏再同步除颤治疗(CRT-D)植入术适当、可能适当(MA)或极少适当(RA)的比例。
这是一项对美国国家心血管数据登记处中2018年4月至2019年3月期间在1500多家美国医院接受ICD植入的患者进行的多中心回顾性研究。使用AUC对ICD植入的适当性进行判定。
在309,318例ICD中,241,438例为一级预防植入(78.1%),67,880例为二级预防植入(21.9%);243,532例(79%)可根据AUC进行分类。对于一级预防,185,431例ICD(96.4%)是适当的,5660例(2.9%)为MA,1205例(0.6%)为RA。对于二级预防,47,498例ICD(92.7%)是适当的,2581例(5%)为MA,1157例(2.3%)为RA。大量极少适当的设备被植入纽约心脏协会IV级心力衰竭且不符合高级治疗条件的患者(53.9%)以及40天内发生心肌梗死的患者(18.1%)体内。起搏导线的适当性变化更大,48,470例双腔ICD植入(62%)被分类为适当,29,209例(37.4%)为MA,448例(0.6%)为RA。在CRT-D植入术中,63,848例(82.2%)左心室起搏是适当的,9900例(12.7%)为MA,3940例(5.1%)为RA。共有99,754例植入被认为是适当的,但被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的国家覆盖范围判定排除在外。超过92%的医院极少适当植入率<4%。
在这个大型国家登记处中,95%可分类的ICD和CRT-D植入被认为是适当的,极少适当植入<2%。近100,000例适当植入被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的国家覆盖范围判定排除在外。