Eichhorn Christian, Koeckerling David, Reddy Rohin K, Ardissino Maddalena, Rogowski Marek, Coles Bernadette, Hunziker Lukas, Greulich Simon, Shiri Isaac, Frey Norbert, Eckstein Jens, Windecker Stephan, Kwong Raymond Y, Siontis George C M, Gräni Christoph
Division of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen.
JAMA. 2024 Sep 19;332(18):1535-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13946.
Accurate risk stratification of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) remains challenging.
To evaluate the association of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging-derived measurements with clinical outcomes in NIDCM.
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were systematically searched for articles from January 2005 to April 2023.
Prospective and retrospective nonrandomized diagnostic studies reporting on the association between CMR imaging-derived measurements and adverse clinical outcomes in NIDCM were deemed eligible.
Prespecified items related to patient population, CMR imaging measurements, and clinical outcomes were extracted at the study level by 2 independent reviewers. Random-effects models were fitted using restricted maximum likelihood estimation and the method of Hartung, Knapp, Sidik, and Jonkman.
All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, arrhythmic events, heart failure events, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
A total of 103 studies including 29 687 patients with NIDCM were analyzed. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) presence and extent (per 1%) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.60-2.04]; P < .001 and HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.12]; P = .02, respectively), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.43 [95% CI, 2.13-2.78]; P < .001 and HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24]; P = .01), arrhythmic events (HR, 2.69 [95% CI, 2.20-3.30]; P < .001 and HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.03-1.12]; P = .004) and heart failure events (HR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.73-2.27]; P < .001 and HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]; P = .02). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (per 1%) was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02]; P = .47), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-1.00]; P = .05), or arrhythmic outcomes (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.01]; P = .34). Lower risks for heart failure events (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98]; P = .002) and MACE (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; P < .001) were observed with higher LVEF. Higher native T1 relaxation times (per 10 ms) were associated with arrhythmic events (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]; P = .04) and MACE (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.11]; P = .03). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (per 1%) was not associated with heart failure events (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.95-1.18]; P = .15) or MACE (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.94-1.14]; P = .43). Limited data precluded definitive analysis for native T1 relaxation times, GLS, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) with respect to mortality outcomes.
The presence and extent of LGE were associated with various adverse clinical outcomes, whereas LVEF was not significantly associated with mortality and arrhythmic end points in NIDCM. Risk stratification using native T1 relaxation times, extracellular volume fraction, and global longitudinal strain requires further evaluation.
非缺血性扩张型心肌病(NIDCM)的准确风险分层仍然具有挑战性。
评估心脏磁共振成像(CMR)测量值与NIDCM临床结局之间的关联。
对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science核心合集数据库进行系统检索,以查找2005年1月至2023年4月的文章。
报告CMR成像测量值与NIDCM不良临床结局之间关联的前瞻性和回顾性非随机诊断研究被视为合格。
由2名独立审阅者在研究层面提取与患者人群、CMR成像测量值和临床结局相关的预先指定项目。使用限制最大似然估计以及Hartung、Knapp、Sidik和Jonkman方法拟合随机效应模型。
全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、心律失常事件、心力衰竭事件和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。
共分析了103项研究,包括29687例NIDCM患者。钆延迟增强(LGE)的存在和范围(每增加1%)与全因死亡率升高相关(风险比[HR],1.81[95%CI,1.60 - 2.04];P <.001和HR,1.07[95%CI,1.02 - 1.12];P = 0.02)、心血管死亡率(HR,2.43[95%CI,2.13 - 2.78];P <.001和HR,1.15[95%CI,1.07 - 1.24];P = 0.01)、心律失常事件(HR,2.69[95%CI,2.20 - 3.30];P <.001和HR,1.07[95%CI,1.03 - 1.12];P = 0.004)和心力衰竭事件(HR,1.98[95%CI,1.73 - 2.27];P <.001和HR,1.06[95%CI,1.01 - 1.10];P = 0.02)。左心室射血分数(LVEF)(每增加1%)与全因死亡率(HR,0.99[95%CI,0.97 - 1.02];P = 0.47)、心血管死亡率(HR,0.97[95%CI,0.94 - 1.00];P = 0.05)或心律失常结局(HR,0.99[95%CI,0.97 - 1.01];P = 0.34)无关。LVEF越高,心力衰竭事件(HR,0.97[95%CI,0.95 - 0.98];P = 0.002)和MACE(HR,0.98[95%CI,0.96 - 0.99];P <.001)的风险越低。较高的固有T1弛豫时间(每增加10 ms)与心律失常事件(HR,1.07[95%CI,1.01 - 1.14];P = 0.04)和MACE(HR,1.06[95%CI,1.01 - 1.11];P = 0.03)相关。整体纵向应变(GLS)(每增加1%)与心力衰竭事件(HR,1.06[95%CI,0.95 - 1.18];P = 0.15)或MACE(HR,1.03[95%CI,0.94 - 1.14];P = 0.43)无关。关于固有T1弛豫时间、GLS和细胞外容积分数(ECV)与死亡率结局的有限数据妨碍了确定性分析。
LGE的存在和范围与各种不良临床结局相关,而LVEF在NIDCM中与死亡率和心律失常终点无显著关联。使用固有T1弛豫时间、细胞外容积分数和整体纵向应变进行风险分层需要进一步评估。