Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Dec 6;13:1286527. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1286527. eCollection 2023.
The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is recommended for the conservative diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI). The technique is based on a 120-minute difference between microbial growth in blood drawn through the catheter and blood drawn through a peripheral vein. However, this cut-off has failed to confirm C-RBSI caused by spp. and .
We hypothesized that the biofilm of both microorganisms disperses faster than that of other microorganisms and that microbial load is rapidly equalized between catheter and peripheral blood. Therefore, our aim was to compare the biofilm dynamics of various microorganisms.
Biofilm of ATCC strains of methicillin-resistant , methicillin-susceptible , , and was grown on silicon disks and analyzed using time-lapse optical microscopy. The time-lapse images of biofilms were processed using ImageJ2 software. Cell dispersal time and biofilm thickness were calculated.
The mean (standard deviation) dispersal time in and biofilms was at least nearly 3 hours lower than in biofilm of , and at least 15 minutes than in and biofilms.
Our findings could explain why early dissemination of cells in and prevents us from confirming or ruling out the catheter as the source of the bloodstream infection using the cut-off of 120 minutes in the DTTP technique. In addition, DTTP may not be sufficiently reliable for since their dispersion time is less than the cut-off of 120 minutes.
推荐使用差异阳性时间 (DTTP) 技术来保守诊断导管相关血流感染 (C-RBSI)。该技术基于通过导管抽取的血液与外周静脉抽取的血液之间微生物生长的 120 分钟差异。然而,这一截止值未能确认 种和 种引起的 C-RBSI。
我们假设这两种微生物的生物膜比其他微生物扩散得更快,并且微生物负荷在导管和外周血液之间迅速平衡。因此,我们的目的是比较各种微生物的生物膜动力学。
在硅盘上培养耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和 的 ATCC 菌株生物膜,并使用延时光学显微镜进行分析。使用 ImageJ2 软件处理延时图像。计算细胞分散时间和生物膜厚度。
和 生物膜的平均(标准差)分散时间至少比 生物膜低 3 小时,至少比 和 生物膜低 15 分钟。
我们的发现可以解释为什么 和 中细胞的早期扩散使我们无法使用 DTTP 技术的 120 分钟截止值来确认或排除导管是血流感染的来源。此外,由于其分散时间小于 120 分钟的截止值,DTTP 对 可能不够可靠。