Intensive Care Unit, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Queensland Critical Care Research Network (QCCRN), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;49(2):178-190. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
In the critically ill, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) are associated with significant mortality. Granular data are required for optimizing management, and developing guidelines and clinical trials.
We carried out a prospective international cohort study of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with HA-BSI treated in intensive care units (ICUs) between June 2019 and February 2021.
2600 patients from 333 ICUs in 52 countries were included. 78% HA-BSI were ICU-acquired. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 8 [IQR 5; 11] at HA-BSI diagnosis. Most frequent sources of infection included pneumonia (26.7%) and intravascular catheters (26.4%). Most frequent pathogens were Gram-negative bacteria (59.0%), predominantly Klebsiella spp. (27.9%), Acinetobacter spp. (20.3%), Escherichia coli (15.8%), and Pseudomonas spp. (14.3%). Carbapenem resistance was present in 37.8%, 84.6%, 7.4%, and 33.2%, respectively. Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) was present in 23.5% and pan-drug resistance in 1.5%. Antimicrobial therapy was deemed adequate within 24 h for 51.5%. Antimicrobial resistance was associated with longer delays to adequate antimicrobial therapy. Source control was needed in 52.5% but not achieved in 18.2%. Mortality was 37.1%, and only 16.1% had been discharged alive from hospital by day-28.
HA-BSI was frequently caused by Gram-negative, carbapenem-resistant and DTR pathogens. Antimicrobial resistance led to delays in adequate antimicrobial therapy. Mortality was high, and at day-28 only a minority of the patients were discharged alive from the hospital. Prevention of antimicrobial resistance and focusing on adequate antimicrobial therapy and source control are important to optimize patient management and outcomes.
在危重病患者中,医院获得性血流感染(HA-BSI)与显著的死亡率相关。需要详细的数据来优化管理,并制定指南和临床试验。
我们进行了一项前瞻性的国际队列研究,纳入了 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在重症监护病房(ICU)治疗的成年(≥18 岁)HA-BSI 患者。
来自 52 个国家的 333 个 ICU 的 2600 名患者纳入研究。78%的 HA-BSI 是 ICU 获得的。HA-BSI 诊断时,中位序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为 8 [IQR 5; 11]。感染的最常见来源包括肺炎(26.7%)和血管内导管(26.4%)。最常见的病原体是革兰氏阴性菌(59.0%),主要是肺炎克雷伯菌(27.9%)、鲍曼不动杆菌(20.3%)、大肠埃希菌(15.8%)和铜绿假单胞菌(14.3%)。碳青霉烯类耐药分别为 37.8%、84.6%、7.4%和 33.2%。分别有 23.5%、1.5%存在治疗困难的耐药(DTR)和泛耐药。24 小时内获得适当抗菌治疗的比例为 51.5%。抗菌药物耐药与获得适当抗菌治疗的时间延迟相关。需要进行源头控制的比例为 52.5%,但仅 18.2%的患者得到了有效控制。死亡率为 37.1%,仅有 16.1%的患者在第 28 天存活出院。
HA-BSI 常由革兰氏阴性、碳青霉烯类耐药和 DTR 病原体引起。抗菌药物耐药导致适当抗菌治疗的延迟。死亡率较高,在第 28 天,仅有少数患者存活出院。预防抗菌药物耐药,重点关注适当的抗菌治疗和源头控制,对于优化患者管理和结局至关重要。