• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内神经外科手术后Stanch Belt Plus在术后管理中的效用

Usefulness of Stanch Belt Plus in Postoperative Management after Endovascular Neurosurgery.

作者信息

Nishihori Masahiro, Kawase Ryo, Izumi Takashi, Nakase Hiroe, Onishi Erina, Saito Ryuta

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Nursing Department, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023;17(12):281-285. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0053. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0053
PMID:38125960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10730299/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We verified the usefulness of patient management using a balloon-pressurized belt (Stanch Belt Plus) to prevent puncture site hematomas, which can occur at a specific rate even with hemostatic devices after endovascular neurosurgery.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients who underwent endovascular surgery with a femoral puncture from April 2019 to September 2020 were divided into two groups: 31 cases using a traditional compression belt and 82 cases using a newly introduced balloon-pressurized belt during this period. The clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. The chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for significant differences.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in treatment procedures or frequency of hemostatic device use, but the balloon-pressurized belt group had a significantly lower incidence of hematomas (2.4% vs 12.9%, p <0.05) and a significantly lower incidence of moderate or higher lumbago (22.0% vs 41.9%, p <0.05). The incidence of epidermal detachment tended to be low; however, no significant difference was observed (3.7% vs. 12.9%, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Patient management with the newly introduced balloon-pressurized belt may decrease the occurrence of groin hematoma and lumbago among complications after endovascular neurosurgery.

摘要

目的

我们验证了使用球囊加压带(Stanch Belt Plus)进行患者管理以预防穿刺部位血肿的有效性,即使在血管内神经外科手术后使用止血装置,穿刺部位血肿也可能以一定比例发生。

方法

2019年4月至2020年9月期间共113例行股动脉穿刺血管内手术的患者被分为两组:在此期间,31例使用传统压迫带,82例使用新引入的球囊加压带。对临床资料进行回顾性分析。采用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验来检验显著差异。

结果

治疗程序或止血装置使用频率无显著差异,但球囊加压带组血肿发生率显著更低(2.4%对12.9%,p<0.05),中度或更严重腰痛的发生率也显著更低(22.0%对41.9%,p<0.05)。表皮剥脱的发生率有降低趋势;然而,未观察到显著差异(3.7%对12.9%,无统计学意义)。

结论

使用新引入的球囊加压带进行患者管理可能会降低血管内神经外科手术后并发症中腹股沟血肿和腰痛的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98a/10730299/dc9c0bddfab3/jnet-17-281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98a/10730299/508771162e8b/jnet-17-281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98a/10730299/dc9c0bddfab3/jnet-17-281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98a/10730299/508771162e8b/jnet-17-281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98a/10730299/dc9c0bddfab3/jnet-17-281-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness of Stanch Belt Plus in Postoperative Management after Endovascular Neurosurgery.血管内神经外科手术后Stanch Belt Plus在术后管理中的效用
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023;17(12):281-285. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0053. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Superficial Femoral Artery Access for Infrainguinal Antegrade Endovascular Interventions in the Hostile Groin: A Prospective Randomized Study.股浅动脉入路在复杂腹股沟区经皮腔内血管重建中的应用:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;86:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Timing and nature of in-house postoperative events following uncomplicated elective endovascular aneurysm treatment.单纯择期血管内动脉瘤治疗后院内术后事件的时间及性质
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1063-70. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132676. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
4
Groin complications in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a 10-year single center experience.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内机械取栓术的腹股沟并发症:一项为期10年的单中心经验
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jun;8(6):568-70. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011763. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety of the PRO-glide device as a sUture-mediated ClosurE in Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair in patients with previous groin intervention (from the PRODUCE-TEVAR Trial).PRO-glide装置作为既往腹股沟介入患者胸主动脉腔内修复术中缝合介导闭合方法的临床疗效与安全性(来自PRODUCE-TEVAR试验)
Vascular. 2021 Apr;29(2):237-243. doi: 10.1177/1708538120949669. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Surgical site infections after lower extremity revascularization procedures involving groin incisions.涉及腹股沟切口的下肢血管重建手术后的手术部位感染。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;28(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
7
Comparison of a collagen plug arterial closure device with manual compression after endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease.血管内介入治疗外周动脉疾病后,胶原塞动脉闭合装置与手动压迫的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):104-108.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.025. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Access site complications are uncommon with vascular closure devices or manual compression after lower extremity revascularization.下肢血运重建术后使用血管闭合装置或手动压迫,其入路部位并发症并不常见。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):788-796.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.890. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
Closure device use for common femoral artery antegrade access is higher risk than retrograde access.使用封堵器进行股动脉顺行入路比逆行入路的风险更高。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
10
FemoSeal Device Use for Femoral Artery Closure by Different Techniques.采用不同技术使用FemoSeal装置进行股动脉闭合
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Case-control study of postprocedural arterial puncture site hemorrhage after neuroendovascular treatment.神经血管治疗后血管穿刺部位出血的病例对照研究。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;83(1):125-133. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.83.1.125.
2
Detailed Analysis of Puncture Site Vascular Complications in Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) and JR-NET2.日本神经血管内治疗登记处(JR-NET)和JR-NET2中穿刺部位血管并发症的详细分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54 Suppl 2:17-22.
3
Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study.
药物洗脱支架冠状动脉植入后血小板反应性与临床结局(ADAPT-DES):一项前瞻性多中心登记研究。
Lancet. 2013 Aug 17;382(9892):614-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61170-8. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
4
Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动脉闭合装置与手动压迫在介入放射学程序中用于股动脉止血的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Aug;34(4):723-38. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9981-0. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
5
A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).新型生物可吸收血管闭合装置与手动压迫用于经皮股动脉手术后止血效果的随机对照研究:ECLIPSE(确保血管闭合装置加速止血试验)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.006.
6
Efficacy of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: one-year follow-up results of the Assessment of the Safety of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction.替奈普酶联合依诺肝素、阿昔单抗或普通肝素的疗效:急性心肌梗死新溶栓药物安全性评估-3(ASSENT-3)随机试验的一年随访结果
Am Heart J. 2004 Jun;147(6):993-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.028.
7
Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏导管插入术后动脉穿刺闭合装置与标准手动压迫的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA. 2004 Jan 21;291(3):350-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.3.350.
8
Prospective comparison of hemorrhagic complications after treatment with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.依诺肝素与普通肝素治疗不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死出血并发症的前瞻性比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Dec 1;88(11):1230-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02082-3.