Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 21;18(12):e0295857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295857. eCollection 2023.
Although statins are often discontinued when myalgia arises, a causal relationship may not always exist. How well-tolerated statins are when rechallenge is blinded and controlled is unclear.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023437648) to evaluate the success of statin rechallenge versus matched placebo in those who were previously statin intolerant. Our primary outcome was intolerance; our secondary outcome was the myalgia or global symptom score. Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Eligible trials were randomized controlled trials with parallel or crossover designs examining statin rechallenge in statin-intolerant adults. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool 1). Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) were estimated using fixed effect Mantel-Haenszel statistics. Of 1,941 studies screened, 8 met our inclusion criteria (8 to 491 participants from Asia, Europe, North America, and Oceana). Compared to placebo, intolerance was more common in statin users [325/906 (36%) vs 233/911 (26%), RR 1.40, 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.60, I2 = 0%, 7 trials, number needed to harm 10] and there was no statistically significant difference in myalgia or global symptom score on a 100-point scale [MD 1.08, 95% CI, -1.51 to 3.67, I2 = 0%, 5 trials]. Limitations include only 1 trial asking participants about intolerable symptoms (vs inferring intolerance from discontinuation or trial withdrawal); the small number of trials; the possibility of attrition bias; and the potential for carryover effects in crossover/n-of-1 trial designs.
Of those previously intolerant of statins who were rechallenged with a statin and compared to placebo recipients, medication intolerance was more common amongst statin recipients. However, there was no significant difference in mean myalgia or global symptom score between statin and placebo, and only one-third of those previously believed to be statin intolerant were unable to tolerate a statin on blinded rechallenge; one-quarter were intolerant of placebo.
尽管当出现肌肉疼痛时通常会停止使用他汀类药物,但因果关系并不总是存在。在盲法和对照的情况下重新使用他汀类药物时的耐受性如何尚不清楚。
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO CRD42023437648),以评估以前不耐受他汀类药物的患者重新使用他汀类药物与匹配的安慰剂相比的成功率。我们的主要结局是不耐受;次要结局是肌痛或总体症状评分。从成立到 2023 年 5 月 1 日,我们在 Medline、Embase、CINAHL Plus、Scopus 和 CENTRAL 中进行了搜索。合格的试验是随机对照试验,采用平行或交叉设计,检查他汀类药物不耐受的成年人重新使用他汀类药物的情况。两名独立的审查员选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险(Cochrane 协作风险评估工具 1)。使用固定效应 Mantel-Haenszel 统计计算相对风险(RR)和均数差(MD)。在筛选出的 1941 项研究中,有 8 项符合我们的纳入标准(来自亚洲、欧洲、北美和大洋洲的 8 至 491 名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,他汀类药物使用者更常见不耐受[325/906(36%)比 233/911(26%),RR 1.40,95%CI 1.23 至 1.60,I2 = 0%,7 项试验,危害比 10],而在 100 分制的肌痛或总体症状评分上无统计学意义的差异[MD 1.08,95%CI -1.51 至 3.67,I2 = 0%,5 项试验]。局限性包括只有 1 项试验询问了参与者无法忍受的症状(而不是从停药或试验退出推断不耐受);试验数量少;存在失访偏倚的可能性;以及交叉/n-of-1 试验设计中可能存在的延续效应。
在那些以前不耐受他汀类药物的患者中,重新使用他汀类药物并与安慰剂组进行比较,他汀类药物使用者的药物不耐受更为常见。然而,他汀类药物与安慰剂之间的肌痛或总体症状评分无显著差异,而且只有三分之一以前被认为是他汀类药物不耐受的患者在盲法重新使用时无法耐受他汀类药物;四分之一对安慰剂不耐受。