Suppr超能文献

前瞻性多中心初步验证肢体畸形改良脊柱侧凸矫形器在伴有肢体畸形的小儿患者中的应用。

Prospective Multicenter Preliminary Validation of Limb Deformity-modified Scoliosis Instruments in Pediatric Patients With Limb Deformity.

机构信息

Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Mar 1;44(3):e260-e266. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002605. Epub 2023 Dec 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are few disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in pediatric limb deformity (LD), with authors instead relying on generic PROMs such as the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) to assess treatment outcomes from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to perform preliminary validation of 2 disease-specific PROMs in pediatric patients with LD.

METHODS

LD modifications were created by substituting the word "limb" for "back" in the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ, ages 10 and younger) and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS, ages 11 to 18) survey, creating the LD-EOSQ and LD-SRS instruments. Children were preoperatively administered the age-appropriate LD-PROMs (n=34 LD-EOSQ; n=30 LD-SRS) and PODCI questionnaires. LD-PROMs were assessed for construct (convergent and discriminant) validity, floor and ceiling effects, content validity, and minimal clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Both LD-EOSQ and LD-SRS demonstrated excellent preliminary convergent validity with similar PODCI domains and discriminant validity with demographic information, deformity data, and LLRS-AIM scores. There were minimal floor or ceiling effects. Content validity was achieved in 100% of LD-EOSQ surveys and more than 80% of LD-SRS surveys. Minimal clinically important difference was 0.4 for LD-EOSQ and 0.3 for LD-SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The LD-EOSQ for patients aged 10 and under and LD-SRS for patients aged 11 to 18 demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability in the pediatric LD population. These measures provide more information specifically related to familial impact in younger children and self-image and mental health in adolescents compared to the PODCI and should be further evaluated for use in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-diagnostic. Prospective cross-sectional cohort design.

摘要

简介

目前用于儿童肢体畸形(LD)的疾病特异性患者报告结局测量(PROM)很少,作者通常依赖于通用的 PROM,如儿科结局数据收集工具(PODCI),以从患者角度评估治疗结果。本研究的目的是初步验证两种用于儿童 LD 患者的疾病特异性 PROM。

方法

通过将“limb”一词替换为“back”,对早期发病脊柱侧凸问卷(EOSQ,年龄 10 岁及以下)和脊柱侧凸研究协会(SRS)问卷进行了 LD 改良,创建了 LD-EOSQ 和 LD-SRS 量表。患儿术前分别接受适合年龄的 LD-PROM(n=34 LD-EOSQ;n=30 LD-SRS)和 PODCI 问卷。对 LD-PROM 进行了结构(收敛性和区分度)有效性、地板和天花板效应、内容有效性和最小临床重要差异的评估。

结果

LD-EOSQ 和 LD-SRS 与 PODCI 相似的领域具有良好的初步收敛有效性,与人口统计学信息、畸形数据和 LLRS-AIM 评分具有良好的区分有效性。地板或天花板效应很小。100%的 LD-EOSQ 调查和超过 80%的 LD-SRS 调查达到了内容有效性。LD-EOSQ 的最小临床重要差异为 0.4,LD-SRS 的最小临床重要差异为 0.3。

结论

10 岁及以下儿童的 LD-EOSQ 和 11 至 18 岁儿童的 LD-SRS 在儿童 LD 人群中表现出初步的有效性和可靠性。与 PODCI 相比,这些测量方法提供了与年幼儿童的家族影响以及青少年的自我形象和心理健康更相关的信息,应进一步评估这些患者的使用。

证据等级

二级诊断。前瞻性横断面队列设计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验