Kouna Niki, Noutsos George, Koufopoulou Christina, Panagopoulos Dimitrios, Kattamis Antonis
2nd Department of Anesthesiology, Attiko University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Pediatric Hospital of Athens, Agia Sophia, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Diseases. 2023 Nov 30;11(4):174. doi: 10.3390/diseases11040174.
The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term complications that are associated with the utilized techniques for the insertion of indwelling central venous catheters, that is the open surgical technique, the ultrasound-guided technique, and the transcutaneous technique based on external anatomical landmarks in the right internal jugular vein, to a pediatric population.
This was a prospective randomized trial based on a pediatric patient population under 16 years of age of a tertiary pediatric-oncological hospital. The procedure was performed by a medical team with varying experience regarding the percutaneous and open insertion methods. We studied the outcome of our procedure, based on the immediate and delayed complication rate, as well as the needed time in order to complete the procedure and mean duration of line use.
The patients that were inserted in our protocol were divided into three subgroups based on the selected technique for the insertion of the central venous catheter. A total number of 88 insertions (25.4%) (out of 346) were based on the technique that was using external anatomical landmarks, 121 insertions were based on the ultrasound-guided transcutaneous technique (34.9%), whereas in 137 cases (39.5%) the open surgical technique was preferred. All cases that were related to catheter re-insertion were excluded from our study. We performed a statistical analysis regarding the catheter dwell time between the three subgroups of patients and no significant difference was recorded. Moreover, the development of thrombosis was investigated, and we noted that a higher percentage of this complication was related to the transcutaneous external landmark and open surgical technique. Also, the incidence of infection was taken into consideration, which manifested an increased incidence when the transcutaneous technique based on external landmarks was used.
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion was considered to be a safe and effective technique for the insertion of central venous catheters. Our study also demonstrated a decrease in operating times when performed by operators with increasing expertise, increased preservation of the diameter of the venous lumen, and no increase in complication rates when the ultrasound-guided technique was selected.
本研究的目的是比较用于儿科患者留置中心静脉导管的不同技术(即开放手术技术、超声引导技术和基于右颈内静脉外部解剖标志的经皮技术)的近期和远期并发症。
这是一项针对一家三级儿科肿瘤医院16岁以下儿科患者群体的前瞻性随机试验。该操作由一组对经皮和开放插入方法经验各异的医疗团队进行。我们基于近期和延迟并发症发生率、完成操作所需时间以及导管使用的平均时长来研究操作结果。
根据所选的中心静脉导管插入技术,我们方案中的患者被分为三个亚组。在346例插入操作中,共有88例(25.4%)基于使用外部解剖标志的技术,121例基于超声引导经皮技术(34.9%),而在137例(39.5%)中首选开放手术技术。所有与导管重新插入相关的病例均被排除在我们的研究之外。我们对患者的三个亚组之间的导管留置时间进行了统计分析,未记录到显著差异。此外,对血栓形成的情况进行了调查,我们注意到该并发症的较高比例与经皮外部标志和开放手术技术相关。同时,考虑了感染的发生率,结果显示使用基于外部标志的经皮技术时感染发生率增加。
超声引导经皮插入被认为是一种安全有效的中心静脉导管插入技术。我们的研究还表明,由经验日益丰富的操作人员进行操作时,手术时间会减少,静脉腔直径的保留增加,并且选择超声引导技术时并发症发生率不会增加。