Panitsina Valentina A, Bodrov Semyon Yu, Boulygina Eugenia S, Slobodova Natalia V, Kosintsev Pavel A, Abramson Natalia I
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Biology (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;12(12):1517. doi: 10.3390/biology12121517.
Despite the high level of interest, the population history of arctic foxes during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene remains poorly understood. Here we aimed to fill gaps in the demographic and colonization history of the arctic fox by analyzing new ancient DNA data from fossil specimens aged from 50 to 1 thousand years from the Northern and Polar Urals, historic DNA from museum specimens from the Novaya Zemlya Archipelago and the Taymyr Peninsula and supplementing these data by previously published sequences of recent and extinct arctic foxes from other regions. This dataset was used for reconstruction of a time-calibrated phylogeny and a temporal haplotype network covering four time intervals: Late Pleistocene (ranging from 30 to 13 thousand years bp), Holocene (ranging from 4 to 1 thousand years bp), historical (approximately 150 years), and modern. Our results revealed that Late Pleistocene specimens showed no genetic similarity to either modern or historical specimens, thus supporting the earlier hypothesis on local extinction rather than habitat tracking.
尽管人们对此兴趣浓厚,但对更新世晚期和全新世北极狐的种群历史仍知之甚少。在这里,我们旨在通过分析来自北乌拉尔和极地乌拉尔地区距今50年至1000年的化石标本的新古代DNA数据、新地岛群岛和泰梅尔半岛博物馆标本的历史DNA,并补充此前发表的来自其他地区的现存和已灭绝北极狐的序列数据,来填补北极狐种群统计和殖民历史方面的空白。该数据集用于构建一个时间校准的系统发育树和一个覆盖四个时间间隔的时间单倍型网络:更新世晚期(距今30,000年至13,000年)、全新世(距今4,000年至1,000年)、历史时期(约150年)和现代。我们的结果表明,更新世晚期的标本与现代或历史标本均无遗传相似性,从而支持了早期关于当地灭绝而非栖息地追踪的假设。