Pimentel E C G, Edel C, Emmerling R, Götz K-U
Institute of Animal Breeding, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Grub, 85586 Germany.
Institute of Animal Breeding, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Grub, 85586 Germany.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Jun;107(6):3716-3723. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24070. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
Pedigrees used in genetic evaluations contain errors. Because of such errors, assumptions regarding the relatedness among individuals in genetic evaluation models are wrong. Consequences of that have been investigated in earlier studies focusing on models that did not account for genomic information yet. The objective of this work was to investigate the effects of pedigree errors on the results from genetic evaluations using the single-step model, and the effect of such effects on results from validation studies with forward prediction. We used a real pedigree (n = 361,980) and real genotypes (n = 25,950) of Fleckvieh cattle, sampled in a way to provide a good consistency between pedigree and genomic relationships. Given the real pedigree and genotypes, true breeding values (TBV) were simulated to have a covariance structure equal to the matrix H assumed in a single-step model. Based on TBV, phenotypes were simulated with a heritability of 0.25. Genetic evaluations were conducted with a conventional animal model (i.e., without genomic information) and a single-step animal model under scenarios using either the correct pedigree or a pedigree containing 5%, 10%, or 20% of wrong records. Wrong records were simulated by randomly assigning wrong sires to nongenotyped females. The increasing rates of pedigree errors led to decreasing correlations between TBV and EBV and lower standard deviations of predictions. Less variation was observed because pedigree errors operate actually as a random exchange of daughters among bulls, making them look more similar to each other than they actually are. This occurs of course only when animals have progeny. Therefore, this decreased variation was more pronounced for progeny tested bulls than for young selection candidates. In a forward prediction validation scenario, the stronger decrease in variation when animals get progeny caused an apparent inflation of early predictions. This phenomenon may contribute to the usually observed problem of inflation of early predictions observed in validation studies.
用于遗传评估的系谱存在错误。由于这些错误,遗传评估模型中关于个体间亲缘关系的假设是错误的。早期研究已针对尚未考虑基因组信息的模型,对其后果进行了调查。本研究的目的是探讨系谱错误对使用单步模型进行遗传评估结果的影响,以及这种影响对正向预测验证研究结果的作用。我们使用了弗莱维赫牛的真实系谱(n = 361,980)和真实基因型(n = 25,950),采样方式使得系谱与基因组关系具有良好的一致性。给定真实系谱和基因型,模拟真实育种值(TBV)使其协方差结构等于单步模型中假设的矩阵H。基于TBV,模拟遗传力为0.25的表型。在使用正确系谱或包含5%、10%或20%错误记录的系谱的情况下,分别用传统动物模型(即不包含基因组信息)和单步动物模型进行遗传评估。通过将错误的父系随机分配给非基因型雌性来模拟错误记录。系谱错误率的增加导致TBV与估计育种值(EBV)之间的相关性降低,预测的标准差也降低。观察到的变异减少是因为系谱错误实际上起到了公牛间女儿随机交换的作用,使它们看起来比实际情况更相似。当然,这种情况只有在动物有后代时才会发生。因此,对于经过后代测试的公牛,这种变异减少比年轻的选择候选牛更明显。在正向预测验证场景中,动物有后代时变异的更强减少导致早期预测明显膨胀。这种现象可能导致了验证研究中通常观察到的早期预测膨胀问题。