Damgaard Viktoria, Mariegaard Johanna, Lindhardsen Julie Marie, Ehrenreich Hannelore, Miskowiak Kamilla Woznica
Neurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 27;13(12):1648. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13121648.
Emerging evidence highlights moderate hypoxia as a candidate treatment for brain disorders. This systematic review examines findings and the methodological quality of studies investigating hypoxia (10-16% O) for ≥14 days in humans, as well as the neurobiological mechanisms triggered by hypoxia in animals, and suggests optimal treatment protocols to guide future studies. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020. Searches were performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, in May-September 2023. Two authors independently reviewed the human studies with the following tools: (1) revised Cochrane collaboration's risk of bias for randomized trials 2.0; (2) the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions. We identified 58 eligible studies (k = 8 human studies with N = 274 individuals; k = 48 animal studies) reporting the effects of hypoxia on cognition, motor function, neuroimaging, neuronal/synaptic morphology, inflammation, oxidative stress, erythropoietin, neurotrophins, and Alzheimer's disease markers. A total of 75% of human studies indicated cognitive and/or neurological benefits, although all studies were evaluated ashigh risk of bias due to a lack of randomization and assessor blinding. Low-dose intermittent or continuous hypoxia repeated for 30-240 min sessions, preferably in combination with motor-cognitive training, produced beneficial effects, and high-dose hypoxia with longer (≥6 h) durations and chronic exposure produced more adverse effects. Larger and methodologically stronger translational studies are warranted.
新出现的证据表明,中度缺氧是治疗脑部疾病的一种潜在方法。本系统评价考察了关于人类≥14天缺氧(10 - 16%氧气浓度)研究的结果和方法学质量,以及动物体内缺氧引发的神经生物学机制,并提出了最佳治疗方案以指导未来研究。我们遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020。于2023年5月至9月在PubMed/MEDLINE、PsycInfo、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行了检索。两位作者使用以下工具独立审查了人体研究:(1)修订后的Cochrane协作网随机试验偏倚风险评估工具2.0;(2)干预性非随机研究中的偏倚风险评估工具。我们确定了58项符合条件的研究(k = 8项人体研究,N = 274人;k = 48项动物研究),报告了缺氧对认知、运动功能、神经影像学、神经元/突触形态、炎症、氧化应激、促红细胞生成素、神经营养因子和阿尔茨海默病标志物的影响。尽管由于缺乏随机化和评估者盲法,所有研究均被评估为高偏倚风险,但总共75%的人体研究表明存在认知和/或神经方面的益处。低剂量间歇性或持续性缺氧,每次持续30 - 240分钟,最好与运动认知训练相结合,产生了有益效果,而高剂量、持续时间更长(≥6小时)的慢性缺氧则产生了更多不良影响。需要开展规模更大、方法学更严谨的转化研究。