Nakamaru Ryo, Ikemura Nobuhiro, Kimura Takehiro, Katsumata Yoshinori, Sherrod Charles F, Miyama Hiroshi, Shiraishi Yasuyuki, Kanki Hideaki, Negishi Koji, Ueda Ikuko, Fukuda Keiichi, Takatsuki Seiji, Kohsaka Shun
Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(24):7712. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247712.
The discontinuation of oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains as a significant concern in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The discontinuation rate may vary depending on management strategy, and physicians may also discontinue OACs due to concerns about patient satisfaction with their care. We aimed to assess the incidence of OAC discontinuation and its relationship to patients' health in an outpatient AF registry.
From a multicenter registry for newly recognized AF patients ( = 3313), we extracted 1647 (49.7%) patients with OACs and a CHADS-Vasc score of ≥2. Discontinuation was defined as sustained cessation of OACs within a 1-year follow-up. We examined predictors associated with discontinuation and its relations to health status defined by the AFEQT questionnaire. Of the 1647 patients, 385 (23.6%) discontinued OACs after 1 year, with discontinuation rates varying across treatment strategies (15.3% for catheter ablation, 4.9% for rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs, and 3.0% for rate control). Successful rhythm control was associated with discontinuation in the catheter ablation (OR 6.61, 95% CI 3.00-14.6, < 0.001) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.62-15.9, < 0.001) groups, whereas the incidence of bleeding events within 1 year was associated with discontinuation in the rate control group. One-year AFEQT scores did not significantly differ between patients who discontinued OACs and those who did not in each treatment strategy group.
OAC discontinuation was common among AF patients with significant stroke risk but varied depending on the chosen treatment strategy. This study also found no significant association between OAC discontinuation and patients' health status.
在心房颤动(AF)的管理中,口服抗凝药(OACs)的停用仍然是一个重大问题。停用率可能因管理策略而异,医生也可能因担心患者对其治疗的满意度而停用OACs。我们旨在评估门诊AF登记处中OAC停用的发生率及其与患者健康的关系。
从一个针对新确诊AF患者的多中心登记处(n = 3313)中,我们提取了1647例(49.7%)使用OACs且CHADS-Vasc评分≥2的患者。停用定义为在1年随访期内持续停止使用OACs。我们检查了与停用相关的预测因素及其与AFEQT问卷定义的健康状况的关系。在1647例患者中,385例(23.6%)在1年后停用了OACs,停用率因治疗策略而异(导管消融术为15.3%,抗心律失常药物节律控制为4.9%,心率控制为3.0%)。在导管消融术(OR 6.61,95%CI 3.00 - 14.6,P < 0.001)和抗心律失常药物(OR 6.47,95%CI 2.62 - 15.9,P < 0.001)组中,成功的节律控制与停用相关,而在心率控制组中,1年内出血事件的发生率与停用相关。在每个治疗策略组中,停用OACs的患者和未停用的患者之间,1年AFEQT评分无显著差异。
在有显著卒中风险的AF患者中,OAC停用很常见,但因所选治疗策略而异。本研究还发现OAC停用与患者健康状况之间无显著关联。