Suppr超能文献

耳鼻咽喉科亚专业对经口机器人手术认知的影响:一项国际YO-IFOS调查

Influence of Otolaryngological Subspecialties on Perception of Transoral Robotic Surgery: An International YO-IFOS Survey.

作者信息

Maniaci Antonino, Chiesa Estomba Carlos, Fakhry Nicolas, Vaira Luigi Angelo, Remacle Marc, Cammaroto Giovanni, Barillari Maria Rosaria, Iannella Giannicola, Mayo-Yanez Miguel, Saibene Alberto Maria, Baudouin Robin, Maza-Solano Juan, Mendelsohn Abie H, Holsinger Floyd Christopher, Ceccon Fabio P, Haddad Leonardo, Hans Stephane, La Mantia Ignazio, Cocuzza Salvatore, Gulinello Federica, Ayad Tareck, Lechien Jerome R

机构信息

Robotics Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies, 75000 Paris, France.

Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):1717. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121717.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate perception, adoption, and awareness on the part of otolaryngology and head and neck surgeons (OTO-HNS) of transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

Several items assessed: awareness/perception; access to TORS; training; indications and advantages/hurdles to TORS practice. A subanalysis was performed to assess differences according to the identified otolaryngological subspecialties.

RESULTS

A total of 359 people completed the survey. Among subspecialties, while for otolaryngologists 30/359 (8.4%) and H&N surgeons 100/359 (27.9%) TORS plays an effective role in hospital stay, laryngologists frequently disagreed (54.3%). There was a lower incidence among rhinologists and otologists (1.9%). Pediatric surgeons (0.8%) reported a positive response regarding the adoption of robotic surgery, and head and neck specialists expressed an even greater response (14.2%). Low adherence was related to perceived cost-prohibitive TORS, by 50% of H&N surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Perception, adoption, and knowledge about TORS play a key role in the application of the robotic system, significantly varying across subspecialties.

摘要

背景

调查耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医生(OTO-HNS)对经口机器人手术(TORS)的认知、采用情况及了解程度。

方法

评估了多个项目:认知/了解程度;TORS的获取途径;培训;TORS实践的适应症及优势/障碍。进行了一项亚分析以评估根据确定的耳鼻咽喉科亚专业的差异。

结果

共有359人完成了调查。在各亚专业中,虽然对于耳鼻咽喉科医生30/359(8.4%)和头颈外科医生100/359(27.9%)而言,TORS在缩短住院时间方面发挥了有效作用,但喉科医生经常持不同意见(54.3%)。鼻科医生和耳科医生中的发生率较低(1.9%)。儿科外科医生(0.8%)对采用机器人手术给出了肯定答复,而头颈专科医生的答复比例更高(14.2%)。50%的头颈外科医生认为TORS成本过高,这与采用率低有关。

结论

对TORS的认知、采用情况和了解程度在机器人系统的应用中起着关键作用,各亚专业之间存在显著差异。

相似文献

2
Are new and young generations of surgeons more aware of transoral robotic surgery than older ones? An international survey.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2065-2072. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01619-6. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Adoption of otolaryngologist-head neck surgeons toward transoral robotic surgery: An international survey.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec 25;8(1):95-102. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1003. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
The acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Australia and New Zealand.
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):301-307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0856-8. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Transoral Robotic Surgical Proficiency Via Real-Time Tactile Collision Awareness System.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130 Suppl 6:S1-S17. doi: 10.1002/lary.29034. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
Role of transoral robotic surgery in current head & neck practice.
Surgeon. 2017 Jun;15(3):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
8
Impact of subspecialty training on management of laryngopharyngeal reflux: results of a worldwide survey.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun;278(6):1933-1943. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06710-y. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
International palate surgery questionnaire.
Sleep Breath. 2023 May;27(2):569-590. doi: 10.1007/s11325-022-02631-0. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
Robotic Head and Neck Surgery: Beyond TORS.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Jul 9;22(9):88. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00950-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Neck dissection and trans oral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022 Feb;49(1):117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
Robotic-Assisted Surgery Training (RAST) Program: An Educational Research Protocol.
Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:52-55. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.SO1428.
3
Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct;278(10):4021-4026. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06623-w. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
4
The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality.
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021 Jan 13;48:e20202798. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202798. eCollection 2021.
5
Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence Application for Endourology and Robotic Surgery.
Urol Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;48(1):151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Cost Considerations for Robotic Surgery.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;53(6):1131-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Is robotic surgery feasible at a safety net hospital?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4452-4458. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07948-z. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
A Standardized Robotic Training Curriculum in a General Surgery Program.
JSLS. 2019 Oct-Dec;23(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00045.
9
Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery: current perspective and future directions.
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Jan;30(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000692.
10
A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):361-367. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06775-1. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验