Stavroulakis Petros Ioannis, Ganetsos Theodore, Zabulis Xenophon
Institute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 700 13 Heraklion, Greece.
Non-Destructive Techniques Laboratory, University of West Attica, 122 41 Egaleo, Greece.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;23(24):9814. doi: 10.3390/s23249814.
The practical, rapid, and accurate optical 3D reconstruction of transparent objects with contemporary non-contact optical techniques, has been an open challenge in the field of optical metrology. The combination of refraction, reflection, and transmission in transparent objects makes it very hard to use common off-the-shelf 3D reconstruction solutions to accurately reconstruct transparent objects in three dimensions without completely coating the object with an opaque material. We demonstrate in this work that a specific class of transparent objects can indeed be reconstructed without the use of opaque spray coatings, via Optical Projection Tomography (OPT). Particularly, the 3D reconstruction of large thin-walled hollow transparent objects can be achieved via OPT, without the use of refractive-index-matching liquid, accurately enough for use in both cultural heritage and beverage packaging industry applications. We compare 3D reconstructions of our proposed OPT method to those achieved by an industrial-grade 3D scanner and report average shape differences of ±0.34 mm for 'shelled' hollow objects and ±0.92 mm for 'non-shelled' hollow objects. A disadvantage of using OPT, which was noticed on the thicker 'non-shelled' hollow objects, as opposed to the 'shelled' hollow objects, was that it induced partial filling of hollow areas and the deformation of embossed features.
利用当代非接触光学技术对透明物体进行实用、快速且准确的光学三维重建,一直是光学计量领域的一个开放性挑战。透明物体中折射、反射和透射的综合作用,使得很难使用普通的现成三维重建解决方案,在不使用不透明材料完全覆盖物体的情况下,准确地对透明物体进行三维重建。我们在这项工作中证明,通过光学投影断层扫描(OPT),确实可以在不使用不透明喷涂涂层的情况下重建特定类别的透明物体。特别是,大型薄壁中空透明物体的三维重建可以通过OPT实现,无需使用折射率匹配液,其精度足以用于文化遗产和饮料包装行业应用。我们将我们提出的OPT方法的三维重建结果与工业级三维扫描仪的重建结果进行了比较,报告了“带壳”中空物体的平均形状差异为±0.34毫米,“无壳”中空物体的平均形状差异为±0.92毫米。与“带壳”中空物体相比,在较厚的“无壳”中空物体上发现的使用OPT的一个缺点是,它会导致中空区域部分填充和压纹特征变形。