Ph.D. Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
NeuroMi (Neuroscience Center), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Mar;59(5):874-933. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16149. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
The limits of the standard, behaviour-based clinical assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) prompted the employment of functional neuroimaging, neurometabolic, neurophysiological and neurostimulation techniques, to detect brain-based covert markers of awareness. However, uni-modal approaches, consisting in employing just one of those techniques, are usually not sufficient to provide an exhaustive exploration of the neural underpinnings of residual awareness. This systematic review aimed at collecting the evidence from studies employing a multimodal approach, that is, combining more instruments to complement DoC diagnosis, prognosis and better investigating their neural correlates. Following the PRISMA guidelines, records from PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus were screened to select peer-review original articles in which a multi-modal approach was used for the assessment of adult patients with a diagnosis of DoC. Ninety-two observational studies and 32 case reports or case series met the inclusion criteria. Results highlighted a diagnostic and prognostic advantage of multi-modal approaches that involve electroencephalography-based (EEG-based) measurements together with neuroimaging or neurometabolic data or with neurostimulation. Multimodal assessment deepened the knowledge on the neural networks underlying consciousness, by showing correlations between the integrity of the default mode network and the different clinical diagnosis of DoC. However, except for studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography, the integration of more than one technique in most of the cases occurs without an a priori-designed multi-modal diagnostic approach. Our review supports the feasibility and underlines the advantages of a multimodal approach for the diagnosis, prognosis and for the investigation of neural correlates of DoCs.
标准的行为临床评估方法对意识障碍(DoC)患者的评估存在局限性,因此人们开始采用功能神经影像学、神经代谢、神经生理学和神经刺激技术来检测大脑中存在的意识潜在生物标记物。然而,单一模式的方法(即只使用其中一种技术)通常不足以全面探索残留意识的神经基础。本系统综述旨在收集采用多模态方法的研究证据,即结合多种仪器来补充 DoC 的诊断、预后,并更好地研究其神经相关性。本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南,筛选了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Scopus 中的记录,以选择使用多模态方法评估成人意识障碍诊断的同行评审原始文章。92 项观察性研究和 32 项病例报告或病例系列符合纳入标准。结果突出了多模态方法在诊断和预后方面的优势,这些方法涉及基于脑电图(EEG)的测量,以及神经影像学或神经代谢数据,或神经刺激。多模态评估加深了对意识神经网络的认识,表明默认模式网络的完整性与不同的 DoC 临床诊断之间存在相关性。然而,除了使用经颅磁刺激与脑电图相结合的研究外,在大多数情况下,将一种以上的技术整合在一起时,并没有预先设计的多模态诊断方法。本综述支持多模态方法的可行性,并强调了其在诊断、预后以及研究意识障碍神经相关性方面的优势。