Department of Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, College of Science and Arts, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 May;124(5):1509-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05384-0. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
Lower-body aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) offers a unique approach for stimulating improvements in muscular function and aerobic capacity. While there are more than 40 reports documenting acute and chronic responses to lower-body aerobic exercise with BFR, responses to upper-body aerobic exercise with BFR are not clearly established.
We evaluated acute physiological and perceptual responses to arm cranking with and without BFR.
Participants (N = 10) completed 4 arm cranking (6 × 2 min exercise, 1 min recovery) conditions: low-intensity at 40%VO (LI), low-intensity at 40%VO with BFR at 50% of arterial occlusion pressure (BFR50), low-intensity at 40%VO with BFR at 70% of arterial occlusion pressure (BFR70), and high-intensity at 80%VO (HI) while tissue oxygenation, cardiorespiratory, and perceptual responses were assessed.
During exercise, tissue saturation for BFR50 (54 ± 6%), BFR70 (55 ± 6%), and HI (54 ± 8%) decreased compared to LI (61 ± 5%, all P < 0.01) and changes in deoxyhemoglobin for BFR50 (11 ± 4), BFR70 (15 ± 6), and HI (16 ± 10) increased compared to LI (4 ± 2, all P < 0.01). During recovery intervals, tissue saturation for BFR50 and BFR70 decreased further and deoxyhemoglobin for BFR50 and BFR70 increased further (all P < 0.04). Heart rate for BFR70 and HI increased by 9 ± 9 and 50 ± 15b/min, respectively, compared to LI (both P < 0.02). BFR50 (8 ± 2, 1.0 ± 1.0) and BFR70 (10 ± 2, 2.1 ± 1.4) elicited greater arm-specific perceived exertion (6-20 scale) and pain (0-10 scale) compared to LI (7 ± 1, 0.2 ± 0.5, all P < 0.05) and pain for BFR70 did not differ from HI (1.7 ± 1.9).
Arm cranking with BFR decreased tissue saturation and increased deoxyhemoglobin without causing excessive cardiorespiratory strain and pain.
带血流限制(BFR)的下肢有氧运动提供了一种刺激肌肉功能和有氧能力改善的独特方法。虽然有超过 40 份报告记录了下肢有氧运动与 BFR 的急性和慢性反应,但上肢有氧运动与 BFR 的反应尚不清楚。
我们评估了手臂旋转运动有和没有 BFR 的急性生理和感知反应。
参与者(N=10)完成了 4 种手臂旋转运动(6×2 分钟运动,1 分钟恢复)条件:低强度 40%VO(LI)、低强度 40%VO 下 BFR 为动脉闭塞压的 50%(BFR50)、低强度 40%VO 下 BFR 为动脉闭塞压的 70%(BFR70)和高强度 80%VO(HI),同时评估组织氧合、心肺和感知反应。
在运动过程中,BFR50(54±6%)、BFR70(55±6%)和 HI(54±8%)的组织饱和度较 LI(61±5%,均 P<0.01)下降,BFR50(11±4)、BFR70(15±6)和 HI(16±10)的脱氧血红蛋白变化增加,与 LI(4±2,均 P<0.01)相比。在恢复期,BFR50 和 BFR70 的组织饱和度进一步下降,BFR50 和 BFR70 的脱氧血红蛋白进一步增加(均 P<0.04)。与 LI 相比,BFR70 和 HI 的心率分别增加了 9±9 和 50±15b/min(均 P<0.02)。BFR50(8±2,1.0±1.0)和 BFR70(10±2,2.1±1.4)引起的手臂特定感知用力(6-20 量表)和疼痛(0-10 量表)均大于 LI(7±1,0.2±0.5,均 P<0.05),BFR70 的疼痛与 HI 无差异(1.7±1.9)。
带 BFR 的手臂旋转运动降低了组织饱和度,增加了脱氧血红蛋白,而不会导致过度的心肺压力和疼痛。