University of Iowa, United States of America.
Florida State University, United States of America.
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Feb;102:101258. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101258. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
Longitudinal data can provide inferences at both the between-person and within-person levels of analysis, but only to the extent that the statistical models chosen for data analysis are specified to adequately capture these distinct sources of association. The present work focuses on auto-regressive cross-lagged panel models, which have long been used to examine time-lagged reciprocal relations and mediation among multiple variables measured repeatedly over time. Unfortunately, many common implementations of these models fail to distinguish between-person associations among individual differences in the variables' amounts and changes over time, and thus confound between-person and within-person relations either partially or entirely, leading to inaccurate results. Furthermore, in the increasingly complex model variants that continue to be developed, what is not easily appreciated is how substantial differences in interpretation can be created by what appear to be trivial differences in model specification. In the present work, we aimed to (a) help analysts become better acquainted with the some of the more common model variants that fall under this larger umbrella, and (b) explicate what characteristics of one's data and research questions should be considered in selecting a model. Supplementary Materials include annotated model syntax and output using Mplus, lavaan in R, and sem in Stata to help translate these concepts into practice.
纵向数据可以在个体间和个体内水平上提供推断,但前提是为数据分析选择的统计模型被指定为充分捕捉这些不同的关联源。本研究集中于自回归交叉滞后面板模型,该模型长期以来一直用于检验多个变量随时间重复测量的时间滞后相互关系和中介。不幸的是,这些模型的许多常见实现未能区分变量数量和变化的个体差异之间的个体间关联,因此部分或全部混淆了个体间和个体内关系,导致结果不准确。此外,在不断开发的日益复杂的模型变体中,人们不容易理解的是,模型规范中的看似微不足道的差异如何会导致解释上的巨大差异。在本研究中,我们旨在 (a) 帮助分析师更好地了解属于这一更大范畴的一些更常见的模型变体,以及 (b) 说明在选择模型时应考虑数据和研究问题的哪些特征。补充材料包括使用 Mplus、R 中的 lavaan 和 Stata 中的 sem 注释的模型语法和输出,以帮助将这些概念转化为实践。