Suppr超能文献

AO 胫骨平台骨折分类系统:一项独立的组内和组间观察者一致性研究。

The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile.

School of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Injury. 2023 Nov;54 Suppl 6:110741. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.028.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Classifying tibial plateau fractures is paramount in determining treatment regimens and systemizing decision making. The original AO classification described by Müller in 1996 and the Schatzker classification of 1970 are the most cited classifications for tibial plateau fractures, demonstrating substantial to almost perfect agreement. The main problem with these classifications schemes is that they lack the detail required to convey the variety of fracture patterns encountered. In 2018, the AO foundation published a new classification system for proximal tibia fractures, highlighting a more complete and detailed number of categories and subcategories. We sought to independently determine inter and intraobserver agreement of the AO classification system, compared to the previous systems described by Müller and Schatzker.

METHODS

One hundred seven consecutive tibial plateau fractures were screened, and a representative data set of 69 was created. Six independent evaluators (three knee surgeons, three senior orthopedic residents) classified the fractures using the original AO, the Schatzker and the new AO classifications. After six weeks, the 69 cases were randomized and reclassified by all evaluators. The Kappa coefficient (k) was calculated for inter- and intraobserver correlation and is expressed with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

interobserver agreement was moderate for all three classifications. k = 0.464 (0.383-0.560) for the original AO; k = 0.404 (0.337-0.489) for Schatzker; and k = 0.457 (0.371-0.545) for the base categories of the new AO classification. The inclusion of subcategories and letter modifiers to the new classification worsened agreement to k = 0.358 (0.302-0.423) and k = 0.174 (0.134-0.222), respectively. There were no significant differences between knee surgeons and residents for the new classification. Intra-observer correlation was also moderate for each of the scores: k = 0.630 (0.578-0.682) for the original AO; k = 0.623 (0.569-0.674) for Schatzker; and k = 0.621 (0.566-0.678) for the new AO base categories; without differences between knee surgeons or residents.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated an adequate inter and intra-observer agreement for the new AO tibial plateau fractures classification system for its base categories, but not at the subcategory or letter modifier levels.

摘要

目的

对胫骨平台骨折进行分类对于确定治疗方案和系统决策至关重要。Müller 于 1996 年提出的原始 AO 分类和 1970 年的 Schatzker 分类是最常被引用的胫骨平台骨折分类方法,它们之间具有实质性到几乎完美的一致性。这些分类方案的主要问题是缺乏传达所遇到的各种骨折模式所需的细节。2018 年,AO 基金会发布了一种新的胫骨近端骨折分类系统,强调了更完整和详细的分类和亚分类数量。我们旨在独立确定 AO 分类系统与之前由 Müller 和 Schatzker 描述的系统的组内和组间一致性。

方法

筛选了 107 例连续胫骨平台骨折,创建了 69 例具有代表性的数据集。6 名独立评估者(3 名膝关节外科医生,3 名高级骨科住院医师)使用原始 AO、Schatzker 和新 AO 分类对骨折进行分类。六周后,将 69 例病例随机化并由所有评估者重新分类。计算组内和组间相关性的 Kappa 系数(k),并用 95%置信区间表示。

结果

三种分类方法的组间一致性均为中度。原始 AO 的 k 值为 0.464(0.383-0.560);Schatzker 的 k 值为 0.404(0.337-0.489);新 AO 分类的基本分类的 k 值为 0.457(0.371-0.545)。将亚分类和字母修饰符纳入新分类会使一致性变差,k 值分别为 0.358(0.302-0.423)和 0.174(0.134-0.222)。对于新分类,膝关节外科医生和住院医师之间没有显著差异。每个评分的组内相关性也为中度:原始 AO 的 k 值为 0.630(0.578-0.682);Schatzker 的 k 值为 0.623(0.569-0.674);新 AO 基本分类的 k 值为 0.621(0.566-0.678);膝关节外科医生或住院医师之间没有差异。

结论

本研究表明,对于新的 AO 胫骨平台骨折分类系统的基本分类,其具有足够的组内和组间一致性,但在亚分类或字母修饰符级别则不然。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验