Charalambous C P, Tryfonidis M, Alvi F, Moran M, Fang C, Samarji R, Hirst P
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):400-4. doi: 10.1308/003588407X187667.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications in assessing tibial plateau fractures, using plain radiographs.
Fifty tibial plateau fractures were classified independently by six observers as per the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications, using antero-posterior and lateral plain radiographs. Assessment was done on two occasions, 8 weeks apart.
We found that both the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications have a high intra-observer (kappa = 0.57 and 0.53, respectively), and inter-observer (kappa = 0.41 and 0.43, respectively) variation. Classification of tibial plateau fractures into unicondylar versus bicondylar and pure splits versus articular depression +/- split conferred improved inter- and intra-observer variation.
The high inter-observer variation found for the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications must be taken into consideration when these are used as a guidance of treatment and when used in evaluating patients' outcome. Simply classifying tibial plateau fractures into unicondylar versus bicondylar and pure splits versus articular depression +/- split may be more reliable.
本研究旨在利用X线平片评估Schatzker分类法和AO/OTA分类法在评估胫骨平台骨折时观察者内及观察者间的差异。
6名观察者根据Schatzker分类法和AO/OTA分类法,利用前后位和侧位X线平片对50例胫骨平台骨折进行独立分类。评估分两次进行,间隔8周。
我们发现,Schatzker分类法和AO/OTA分类法的观察者内差异(kappa值分别为0.57和0.53)以及观察者间差异(kappa值分别为0.41和0.43)均较高。将胫骨平台骨折分为单髁骨折与双髁骨折、单纯劈裂骨折与关节面塌陷伴/不伴劈裂骨折,可改善观察者内及观察者间的差异。
当将Schatzker分类法和AO/OTA分类法用作治疗指导及评估患者预后时,必须考虑到其较高的观察者间差异。将胫骨平台骨折简单地分为单髁骨折与双髁骨折、单纯劈裂骨折与关节面塌陷伴/不伴劈裂骨折可能更为可靠。