• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老挝人民民主共和国提供基本生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年卫生服务的助产工作监管差距分析。

A regulatory gap analysis of midwifery to deliver essential reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health services in Lao People's Democratic Republic.

作者信息

Kubota Shogo, Ando Moe, Murray John, Khambounheuang Sengmany, Theppanya Khampasong, Nanthavong Phouvanh, Tengbriacheu Chankham, Sisavanh Malouny, Khattiyod Thongchan, Asai Daisuke, Sobel Howard, Jimba Masamine

机构信息

WHO Laos, Vientiane, Lao PDR.

WHO Western Pacific Region, Manilla, Philippines.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Dec 5;43:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100960. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100960
PMID:38146489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10749282/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, midwives are the main providers of primary reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent (RMNCAH) services. We analyzed to what extent practice regulations allow midwives to provide nationally defined essential RMNCAH services.

METHODS

Stakeholder consultations and document reviews were conducted to identify the essential RMNCAH interventions and care tasks midwives are expected to provide without physicians. These were defined in: 1) the Essential Health Service Package (EHSP) and 2) 18 national standards and guidelines. We then mapped whether midwifery regulations, which provide the legal framework for clinical service provision, supported delivery of these standards to identify regulatory gaps. Data were used to update regulations.

FINDINGS

Midwives were expected to provide 39 RMNCAH interventions without physicians, representing 1100 care tasks. Midwifery practice regulations allowed eight of 39 interventions (20.5%) and 705 of 1100 care tasks (64.1%) at baseline. Of the 31 interventions not allowed for provision by midwives, 83.9% (26) required prescribing and giving medicines, 51.6% (16) ordering and conducting diagnostics, 38.7% (12) making a clinical diagnosis, and 22.6% (7) use of non-pharmacological interventions. The Ministry of Health convened a multi-stakeholder group to revise the midwifery practice regulations, which increased the legally supported interventions and care tasks to 37 (94.9%) and 1081 (98.3%), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

This novel methodology enabled systematic identification and quantification of regulatory gaps in midwifery practice and data-driven revisions. Consequently, regulatory support for delivery of primary RMNCAH interventions vastly improved. The approach can be applied to other clinical cadres, service areas and countries.

FUNDING

Korea Foundation for International Health Care (KOFIH) supported research operation.

摘要

背景

在老挝人民民主共和国,助产士是初级生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年保健(RMNCAH)服务的主要提供者。我们分析了实践法规在多大程度上允许助产士提供国家规定的基本RMNCAH服务。

方法

进行了利益相关者协商和文件审查,以确定助产士在无需医生在场的情况下应提供的基本RMNCAH干预措施和护理任务。这些在以下文件中有所定义:1)基本卫生服务包(EHSP)和2)18项国家标准与指南。然后,我们梳理了为临床服务提供法律框架的助产士法规是否支持这些标准的实施,以找出监管差距。利用这些数据来更新法规。

研究结果

预计助产士在无需医生在场的情况下提供39项RMNCAH干预措施,涉及1100项护理任务。在基线时,助产士实践法规允许39项干预措施中的8项(20.5%)以及1100项护理任务中的705项(64.1%)。在助产士不被允许提供的31项干预措施中,83.9%(26项)需要开药和给药,51.6%(16项)需要安排和进行诊断,38.7%(12项)需要做出临床诊断,22.6%(7项)需要使用非药物干预措施。卫生部召集了一个多利益相关者小组来修订助产士实践法规,这使得法律支持的干预措施和护理任务分别增加到37项(94.9%)和1081项(98.3%)。

解读

这种新颖的方法能够系统地识别和量化助产士实践中的监管差距,并进行数据驱动的修订。因此,对提供初级RMNCAH干预措施的监管支持得到了极大改善。该方法可应用于其他临床干部、服务领域和国家。

资金来源

韩国国际医疗保健基金会(KOFIH)支持研究运作。

相似文献

1
A regulatory gap analysis of midwifery to deliver essential reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health services in Lao People's Democratic Republic.老挝人民民主共和国提供基本生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年卫生服务的助产工作监管差距分析。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Dec 5;43:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100960. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
A gap analysis of midwifery competency, pre- and in-service education for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and, adolescent health in Lao People's Democratic Republic.老挝人民民主共和国助产士能力、生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童及青少年健康的职前和在职教育的差距分析。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Dec 5;43:100959. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100959. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Validating midwifery professionals' scope of practice and competency: A multi-country study comparing national data to international standards.验证助产士专业实践和能力范围:一项多国研究比较了国家标准与国际标准。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286310. eCollection 2023.
4
Pre-service and in-service education and training for maternal and newborn care providers in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence review and gap analysis.中低收入国家母婴保健提供者的岗前和在职教育和培训:证据回顾和差距分析。
Midwifery. 2019 Nov;78:104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
5
Nursing and midwifery regulation and HIV scale-up: establishing a baseline in East, Central and Southern Africa.护理和助产学监管与艾滋病毒扩大规模:在东非、中非和南部非洲建立基线。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2013 Mar 25;16(1):18051. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.18051.
6
Strengthening quality in sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health systems in low- and middle-income countries through midwives and facility mentoring: an integrative review.通过助产士和医疗机构指导加强中低收入国家性健康、生殖健康、孕产妇健康和新生儿健康系统的质量:综合评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06027-0.
7
Midwives' challenges and factors that motivate them to remain in their workplace in the Democratic Republic of Congo-an interview study.助产士在刚果民主共和国工作场所面临的挑战和激励他们留下来的因素:一项访谈研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Sep 17;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00510-x.
8
Authorization of midwives to perform basic emergency obstetric and newborn care signal functions in Argentina, Ghana, and India: A multi-country validation study of a key global maternal and newborn health indicator.授权助产士在阿根廷、加纳和印度执行基本紧急产科和新生儿护理信号职能:全球孕产妇和新生儿健康关键指标的多国验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0283029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283029. eCollection 2023.
9
The Scope of Midwifery Practice Regulations and the Availability of the Certified Nurse-Midwifery and Certified Midwifery Workforce, 2012-2016.《助产士执业条例范围和认证护士助产士及认证助产士劳动力的可获得性,2012-2016 年》。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):119-130. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of a midwifery continuity of care program on clinical competence of midwifery students and delivery outcomes: a mixed-methods protocol.助产连续性护理方案对助产学生临床能力和分娩结局的影响:混合方法研究方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05321-5.
2
A gap analysis of midwifery competency, pre- and in-service education for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and, adolescent health in Lao People's Democratic Republic.老挝人民民主共和国助产士能力、生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童及青少年健康的职前和在职教育的差距分析。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Dec 5;43:100959. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100959. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Validating midwifery professionals' scope of practice and competency: A multi-country study comparing national data to international standards.验证助产士专业实践和能力范围:一项多国研究比较了国家标准与国际标准。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286310. eCollection 2023.
2
What prevents health policy being 'evidence-based'? New ways to think about evidence, policy and interventions in health.是什么阻碍了卫生政策成为“基于证据的”?思考卫生领域证据、政策及干预措施的新方法。
Br Med Bull. 2020 Oct 14;135(1):38-49. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldaa026.
3
Assessment of dual practice among physicians in Cambodia.柬埔寨医生双重执业评估。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Mar 12;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-0461-6.
4
UHC Presents Universal Challenges.全民健康覆盖面临普遍挑战。
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jan 2;2(1):11-14. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1132091.
5
The Midwifery Services Framework: The process of implementation.助产服务框架:实施过程
Midwifery. 2018 Mar;58:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway.73个国家助产士教育、监管及协会的描述性分析:2015年后发展路径的基线
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Jun 8;14(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0134-7.
7
What Prevents Quality Midwifery Care? A Systematic Mapping of Barriers in Low and Middle Income Countries from the Provider Perspective.是什么阻碍了高质量的助产护理?从提供者角度对低收入和中等收入国家的障碍进行系统梳理。
PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0153391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153391. eCollection 2016.
8
Bridging evidence, policy, and practice to strengthen health systems for improved maternal and newborn health in Pakistan.衔接证据、政策与实践,以加强巴基斯坦的卫生系统,改善孕产妇和新生儿健康状况。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 25;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0034-7.
9
The Third Global Forum: framing the health workforce agenda for universal health coverage.第三届全球论坛:制定全民健康覆盖的卫生人力议程。
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Dec;1(6):e324-5. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70082-2. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Country experience with strengthening of health systems and deployment of midwives in countries with high maternal mortality.国家在强化卫生系统和部署助产士方面的经验:高孕产妇死亡率国家的情况。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 27;384(9949):1215-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60919-3. Epub 2014 Jun 22.