School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Moran Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Dec 26;35(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad102.
Although patient centredness is part of providing high-quality health care, little is known about the effectiveness of care transition interventions that involve patients and their families on readmissions to the hospital or emergency visits post-discharge. This systematic review (SR) aimed to examine the evidence on patient- and family-centred (PFC) care transition interventions and evaluate their effectiveness on adults' hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits after discharge. Searches of Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases were conducted from the earliest available online year of indexing up to and including 14 March 2021. The studies included: (i) were about care transitions (hospital to home) of ≥18-year-old patients; (ii) had components of patient-centred care and care transition frameworks; (iii) reported on one or more outcomes were among hospital readmissions and ED visits after discharge; and (iv) were cluster-, pilot- or randomized-controlled trials published in English or French. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was performed, and pooled odd ratios, standardized mean differences, and mean differences were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Of the 10,021 citations screened, 50 trials were included in the SR and 44 were included in the meta-analyses. Care transition intervention types included health assessment, symptom and disease management, medication reconciliation, discharge planning, risk management, complication detection, and emotional support. Results showed that PFC care transition interventions significantly reduced the risk of hospital readmission rates compared to usual care [incident rate ratio (IRR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.98; I2 = 73%] regardless of time elapsed since discharge. However, these same interventions had minimal impact on the risk of ED visit rates compared to usual care group regardless of time passed after discharge (IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.18; I2 = 29%). PFC care transition interventions containing a greater number of patient-centred care (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; I2 = 59%) and care transition components (IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; I2 = 4%) significantly decreased the risk of patients being readmitted. However, these interventions did not significantly increase the risk of patients visiting the ED after discharge (IRR, 1.54; CI 95%, 0.91-2.61). Future interventions should focus on patients' and families' values, beliefs, needs, preferences, race, age, gender, and social determinants of health to improve the quality of adults' care transitions.
虽然以患者为中心是提供高质量医疗保健的一部分,但对于涉及患者及其家属的护理过渡干预措施对减少医院再入院或出院后急诊就诊的效果知之甚少。本系统评价(SR)旨在研究以患者和家庭为中心(PFC)的护理过渡干预措施的证据,并评估其对成年人出院后医院再入院和急诊就诊的效果。对 Medline、CINAHL 和 Embase 数据库进行了检索,检索范围从最早可在线检索的年份到 2021 年 3 月 14 日。研究包括:(i)≥18 岁患者的护理过渡(医院到家庭);(ii)包含以患者为中心的护理和护理过渡框架的组成部分;(iii)报告了出院后医院再入院和急诊就诊的一个或多个结果;(iv)是在英语或法语发表的聚类、试点或随机对照试验。两名独立评审员完成了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。进行了叙述性综合分析,并使用随机效应荟萃分析计算了比值比、标准化均数差和均数差。在筛选出的 10021 条引文,50 项试验被纳入系统评价,44 项试验被纳入荟萃分析。护理过渡干预措施的类型包括健康评估、症状和疾病管理、药物重整、出院计划、风险管理、并发症检测和情感支持。结果表明,与常规护理相比,以患者为中心的护理过渡干预措施显著降低了医院再入院率的风险[发生率比(IRR),0.86;95%置信区间(CI),0.75-0.98;I²=73%],无论出院后时间长短。然而,这些相同的干预措施对与常规护理组相比的急诊就诊率风险几乎没有影响,无论出院后经过多长时间(IRR,1.00;95%CI,0.85-1.18;I²=29%)。包含更多以患者为中心的护理(IRR,0.73;95%CI,0.57-0.94;I²=59%)和护理过渡组成部分(IRR,0.76;95%CI,0.64-0.91;I²=4%)的 PFC 护理过渡干预措施显著降低了患者再入院的风险。然而,这些干预措施并没有显著增加患者出院后急诊就诊的风险(IRR,1.54;95%CI,0.91-2.61)。未来的干预措施应侧重于患者及其家属的价值观、信念、需求、偏好、种族、年龄、性别和健康的社会决定因素,以提高成年人护理过渡的质量。