Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Cancer Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6851. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6851. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the head-and-neck area primarily involves the Waldeyer ring (WR) and sinonasal area (SN). However, the differential clinical outcomes between patients with WR-DLBCL and those with SN-DLBCL in the rituximab era remain unclear.
To avoid confounding factors contributed by advanced DLBCL with WR and SN involvement, we assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with stage I/II WR-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL and compared them with those having corresponding stages of DLBCL in the lymph nodes but without other extranodal involvement (LN-DLBCL) in the same period. We compared the patients' clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) among the three subgroups.
We analyzed 67, 15, and 106 patients with WR-DLBCL, SN-DLBCL, and LN-DLBCL, respectively, between January 2000 and December 2019. All patients received front-line rituximab-based regimens, and > 80% received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone-based regimens. More patients with SN-DLBCL had revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) score 3 (27%) when compared with those with WR-DLBCL (7%) and those with LN-DLBCL (10%, p = 0.181). Patients with WR-DLBCL, LN-DLBCL, and SN-DLBCL had 5-year EFS and OS rates of 80.7%, 59.5%, and 41.9% (p = 0.021) and 83.7%, 70.8%, and 55.8% (p = 0.032), respectively. Compared to patients with LN-DLBCL, those with WR-DLBCL also had a significantly favorable 5-year EFS rate (p = 0.021) and 5-year OS rate (p = 0.023). Three of the 15 patients with SN-DLBCL experienced lymphoma recurrence in the brain after front-line treatment. In multivariate analyses, R-IPI scores of 1-2 and 3 served as significantly poor prognostic factors for patients with poor EFS and OS.
Compared to patients with LN-DLBCL, patients with WR-DLBCL receiving front-line rituximab-based treatments had favorable clinical outcomes; however, patients with SN-DLBCL had worse clinical outcomes. Further studies on molecular prognostic factors and treatment strategies for SN-DLBCL are warranted.
弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)主要累及咽淋巴环(WR)和鼻-鼻窦区(SN)。然而,在利妥昔单抗时代,WR-DLBCL 患者与 SN-DLBCL 患者之间的临床结局仍不清楚。
为了避免 WR 和 SN 受累的晚期 DLBCL 带来的混杂因素,我们评估了Ⅰ/Ⅱ期 WR-DLBCL 和 SN-DLBCL 患者的临床结局,并将其与同期具有相应淋巴结 DLBCL 但无其他结外累及(LN-DLBCL)的患者进行比较。我们比较了三组患者的临床特征、治疗方式、无事件生存(EFS)和总生存(OS)。
我们分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间分别患有 WR-DLBCL、SN-DLBCL 和 LN-DLBCL 的 67、15 和 106 例患者。所有患者均接受一线利妥昔单抗为基础的治疗方案,超过 80%的患者接受了利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松的治疗方案。与 WR-DLBCL 患者(7%)和 LN-DLBCL 患者(10%)相比,更多的 SN-DLBCL 患者的修订国际预后指数(R-IPI)评分达到 3(27%)(p=0.181)。WR-DLBCL、LN-DLBCL 和 SN-DLBCL 患者的 5 年 EFS 和 OS 率分别为 80.7%、59.5%和 41.9%(p=0.021)和 83.7%、70.8%和 55.8%(p=0.032)。与 LN-DLBCL 患者相比,WR-DLBCL 患者的 5 年 EFS 率(p=0.021)和 5 年 OS 率(p=0.023)也显著更高。15 例 SN-DLBCL 患者中有 3 例在一线治疗后出现脑淋巴瘤复发。多因素分析显示,R-IPI 评分 1-2 和 3 是 EFS 和 OS 不良的显著预后因素。
与 LN-DLBCL 患者相比,接受一线利妥昔单抗治疗的 WR-DLBCL 患者具有较好的临床结局;然而,SN-DLBCL 患者的临床结局较差。需要进一步研究 SN-DLBCL 的分子预后因素和治疗策略。