Pérez-Pereira A, Carrola J S, Tiritan M E, Ribeiro C
1H-TOXRUN - One Health Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences, CESPU, CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Vila Real, Portugal.
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Vila Real, Portugal; Inov4Agro - Institute for Innovation, Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri-food Production, Portugal.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169573. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169573. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
At present, there is a serious concern about the alarming number of recalcitrant contaminants that can negatively affect biodiversity threatening the ecological status of marine, estuarine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems (e.g., agricultural soils and forests). Contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) such as pharmaceuticals (PHAR), illicit drugs (ID), industrial persistent pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and chiral ionic solvents are globally spread and potentially toxic to non-target organisms. More than half of these contaminants are chiral and have been measured at different enantiomeric proportions in diverse ecosystems. Enantiomers can exhibit different toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics, and thus, can cause different toxic effects. Therefore, the enantiomeric distribution in occurrence cannot be neglected as the toxicity and other adverse biological effects are expected to be enantioselective. Hence, this review aims to reinforce the recognition of the stereochemistry in environmental risk assessment (ERA) of chiral CEC and gather up-to-date information about the current knowledge regarding the enantioselectivity in ecotoxicity of PHAR, ID, persistent pollutants (PCBs and PBDEs) and chiral ionic solvents present in freshwater and agricultural soil ecosystems. We performed an online literature search to obtain state-of-the-art research about enantioselective studies available for assessing the impact of these classes of CEC. Ecotoxicity assays have been carried out using organisms belonging to different trophic levels such as microorganisms, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates, and considering ecologically relevant aquatic and terrestrial species or models organisms recommended by regulatory entities. A battery of ecotoxicity assays was also reported encompassing standard acute toxicity to sub-chronic and chronic assays and different endpoints as biomarkers of toxicity (e.g., biochemical, morphological alterations, reproduction, behavior, etc.). Nevertheless, we call attention to the lack of knowledge about the potential enantioselective toxicity of many PHAR, ID, and several classes of industrial compounds. Additionally, several questions regarding key species, selection of most appropriate toxicological assays and ERA of chiral CEC are addressed and critically discussed.
目前,令人严重关切的是,顽固污染物数量惊人,会对生物多样性产生负面影响,威胁海洋、河口、淡水和陆地生态系统(如农业土壤和森林)的生态状况。新出现的关注污染物(CEC),如药品(PHAR)、非法药物(ID)、工业持久性污染物,如多氯联苯(PCBs)和多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)以及手性离子溶剂,在全球范围内广泛传播,对非目标生物具有潜在毒性。这些污染物中一半以上是手性的,并且在不同生态系统中以不同的对映体比例被检测到。对映体可表现出不同的毒代动力学和毒效动力学,因此可导致不同的毒性效应。因此,由于毒性和其他不利生物效应预计具有对映体选择性,所以在环境中对映体的分布不容忽视。因此,本综述旨在加强对手性CEC环境风险评估(ERA)中立体化学的认识,并收集有关淡水和农业土壤生态系统中PHAR、ID、持久性污染物(PCBs和PBDEs)以及手性离子溶剂生态毒性对映体选择性的最新知识。我们进行了在线文献检索,以获取有关可用于评估这些CEC类别影响的对映体选择性研究的最新研究。已使用属于不同营养级别的生物进行生态毒性试验,如微生物、植物、无脊椎动物和脊椎动物,并考虑生态相关的水生和陆地物种或监管机构推荐的模式生物。还报告了一系列生态毒性试验,包括从标准急性毒性到亚慢性和慢性试验以及作为毒性生物标志物的不同终点(如生化、形态改变、繁殖、行为等)。然而,我们提请注意,对于许多PHAR、ID和几类工业化合物的潜在对映体选择性毒性缺乏了解。此外,还讨论并批判性地探讨了有关关键物种、最合适毒理学试验的选择以及手性CEC的ERA的几个问题。