Suppr超能文献

经静脉导线拔除后将冠状静脉窦导线重新植入同一心脏静脉的逆向圈套技术:一例报告

Antidromic snare technique for re-implantation of a coronary sinus lead into the same cardiac vein after transvenous lead extraction: a case report.

作者信息

Kim Juwon, Chung Tae-Wan, Park Seung-Jung

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023 Dec 12;8(1):ytad625. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad625. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

After coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), occlusion of the branch vessel from which CS lead was extracted is a major obstacle to re-implantation, particularly if that vessel is the only optimal vessel for resynchronization.

CASE SUMMARY

A 75-year-old female who underwent CRT implantation 11 years prior presented with worsening dyspnoea, right ventricle-only pacing rhythm, and increased CS lead pacing threshold. Because she was a CRT responder, we decided to replace the malfunctioning CS lead. After successful extraction, the vessel from which CS lead was extracted was not visualized, and guidewire re-insertion attempts failed. No other branch vessels suitable for re-implantation were observed. Fortunately, distal portion of the target vessel was viewed by a retrograde flow of contrast. A guidewire was advanced retrograde into the target vein via a connecting vessel, and the distal end of the guidewire was snared around CS ostium and then pulled out of the sheath. A new CS lead was inserted through the distal end of the guidewire and successfully implanted antegrade into the same target vein using a veno-venous loop of the guidewire ('anti-dromic snare technique'). The patient was discharged 2 days after the procedure without complications.

DISCUSSION

Antegrade re-implantation of CS lead may not be possible after extracting CS leads with long dwell times, possibly due to extraction-induced vessel occlusion. If the occluded vessel is the only proper vessel for CS lead re-implantation, the anti-dromic snare technique could be a safe and effective bail-out strategy.

摘要

背景

在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者中进行冠状静脉窦(CS)导线拔除后,拔除CS导线的分支血管闭塞是重新植入的主要障碍,特别是当该血管是唯一适合再同步的最佳血管时。

病例摘要

一名11年前接受CRT植入的75岁女性,出现呼吸困难加重、仅右心室起搏心律以及CS导线起搏阈值升高。由于她是CRT反应者,我们决定更换出现故障的CS导线。成功拔除后,未见到拔除CS导线的血管,重新插入导丝的尝试失败。未观察到其他适合重新植入的分支血管。幸运的是,通过造影剂的逆行血流可以看到目标血管的远端部分。通过连接血管将导丝逆行推进到目标静脉中,导丝远端在CS开口处被圈套住,然后从鞘管中拉出。通过导丝远端插入一根新的CS导线,并使用导丝的静脉-静脉环将其成功顺行植入同一目标静脉(“顺行圈套技术”)。术后2天患者出院,无并发症。

讨论

在长时间植入后拔除CS导线后,可能无法进行CS导线的顺行重新植入,这可能是由于拔除导致的血管闭塞。如果闭塞的血管是CS导线重新植入的唯一合适血管,顺行圈套技术可能是一种安全有效的补救策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2053/10751563/b50a43575e27/ytad625il2.jpg

相似文献

3
Distal balloon occlusion allows epicardial lead placement in a tortuous branch of the great cardiac vein.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;25(2):159-61. doi: 10.1007/s10840-008-9331-1. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
4
Veno-venous loop through coronary sinus for LV lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Indian Heart J. 2016 Sep;68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S212-S215. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
Active fixation mechanism complicates coronary sinus lead extraction and limits subsequent reimplantation targets.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Jan;36(1):81-6; discussion 86. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9704-3. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
7
Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.
Cardiol J. 2014;21(2):128-37. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0006. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.
2
Thoracoscopic Implantation of Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 May 16;9(5):160. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9050160.
5
Challenging Implants Require Tools and Techniques Not Tips and Tricks.
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2019 Mar;11(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2018.11.003.
6
Transvenous Extraction of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads and the Risk of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;4(11):1421-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
7
Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Apr;13(4):221-9. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.207. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
8
Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction.
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Dec;7(4):661-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2015.08.020.
9
Cardiac venous left ventricular lead removal and reimplantation following device infection: a large single-center experience.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1213-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02392.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
10
Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;35(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9685-2. Epub 2012 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验