Suppr超能文献

新型可编程阀门治疗特发性正常压力脑积水:成本、疗效和安全性的前瞻性评估

Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus with a Novel Programmable Valve: Prospective Evaluation of Costs, Efficacy, and Safety.

作者信息

Reis Rodolfo Casimiro, Yamashita Renata Harumi Gobbato, Solla Davi Jorge Fontoura, Ramin Laís Fajardo, Teixeira Manoel Jacobsen, Pinto Fernando Campos Gomes

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Neuroradiology Section, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Asian J Neurosurg. 2023 Sep 22;18(3):548-556. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771370. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Programmable valves provide an equal or superior neurological outcome when compared with fixed pressure ones, with fewer complications, in treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients. Long-term costs of these treatments have not been properly compared in literature. We sought to compare costs, efficacy, and safety of 1-year treatment of iNPH patients with programmable valve Sphera Pro and a fixed pressure valve.  A prospective cohort of iNPH patients treated with programmable valve was compared with a historical cohort of iNPH patients treated with fixed pressure valve. Our primary outcome was mean direct cost of treating iNPH up to 1 year. Efficacy in treating iNPH and safety were assessed as secondary outcomes.  Proportions were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Normally distributed variables were compared using the Student's -test or the Mann-Whitney's test. Differences in the evolution of the variables over time were assessed using generalized estimating equations. All tests were two-sided, with an of 0.05.  A total of 19 patients were analyzed in each group (mean age 75 years, the majority male). Comorbidities and clinical presentation were similar between groups. Both fixed pressure and programmable valve patients had neurological improvement over time (  < 0.001), but no difference was seen between groups (  = 0.104). The fixed pressure valve group had more complications than the programmable valve group (52.6% vs. 10.5%, respectively,  = 0.013). Annual treatment cost per patient was US$ 3,820 ± 2,231 in the fixed pressure valve group and US$ 3,108 ± 553 in the programmable valve group. Mean difference was US$712 (95% confidence interval, 393-1,805) in favor of the programmable valve group.  The Sphera Pro valve with gravitational unit had 1 year treatment cost not higher than that of fixed pressure valve, and resulted in similar efficacy and fewer complications.

摘要

与固定压力阀门相比,可编程阀门在治疗特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者时能带来同等或更好的神经学预后,且并发症更少。这些治疗的长期成本在文献中尚未得到恰当比较。我们试图比较使用可编程阀门Sphera Pro和固定压力阀门对iNPH患者进行1年治疗的成本、疗效和安全性。

将接受可编程阀门治疗的iNPH患者前瞻性队列与接受固定压力阀门治疗的iNPH患者历史队列进行比较。我们的主要结局是治疗iNPH长达1年的平均直接成本。将治疗iNPH的疗效和安全性作为次要结局进行评估。

使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验比较比例。对正态分布变量使用学生t检验或曼-惠特尼检验进行比较。使用广义估计方程评估变量随时间演变的差异。所有检验均为双侧检验,α = 0.05。

每组共分析19例患者(平均年龄75岁,大多数为男性)。两组之间的合并症和临床表现相似。固定压力阀门组和可编程阀门组患者的神经功能均随时间改善(P < 0.001),但两组之间无差异(P = 0.104)。固定压力阀门组的并发症比可编程阀门组更多(分别为52.6%和10.5%,P = 0.013)。固定压力阀门组每位患者的年度治疗成本为3820美元±2231美元,可编程阀门组为3108美元±553美元。平均差异为712美元(95%置信区间,393 - 1805美元),有利于可编程阀门组。

带有重力装置的Sphera Pro阀门1年治疗成本不高于固定压力阀门,且疗效相似,并发症更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4516/10749867/eba869df7f49/10-1055-s-0043-1771370-i2340029-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验